Comparing different battery thermal management systems for suppressing thermal runaway propagation

Thermal runaway (TR) stands as a critical risk in battery applications. Even though various battery thermal management systems (BTMSs) have been proposed to mitigate thermal runaway propagation, a comprehensive comparison remains elusive. This study evaluates the performance of three types of BTMSs with 5 configurations, which include: liquid cooling with cold plates added on the bottom (BTMS-1a), liquid cooling with cold plates added on the sides (BTMS-1b), liquid cooling with cold plates added between batteries (BTMS-1c), integrating thermal insulation materials between batteries (BTMS-2), and implementing phase change materials between batteries (BTMS-3). The highest temperature, propagation time, temperature uniformity, cooling rate, mass energy density, and volume energy density are used as key performance indicators for comparison. In general, BTMS-2 and BTMS-3 show advantages in energy density, however, their performances on TR suppression and battery thermal management are poor. BTMS-1c can suppress TR effectively at high flowrates, whereas it can lead to poor temperature uniformity. Suggestions are also provided regarding the selection of BTMSs for different applications: BTMS-1b, BTMS-1c, and BTMS-3 are recommended for small EVs, large EVs and large scale battery energy storage systems (BESSs), and small BESSs, respectively.