Population Dynamic of Far Eastern Leopard(Panthera pardus orientalis)in Wangqing Nature Reserve Based on Infrared Camera Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Kong W. [1 ,2 ]
Sun Q. [3 ]
Liu X. [2 ]
Qu L. [3 ]
Wang F. [3 ]
Yao M. [2 ]
Zou H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wildlife Resource College, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin
[2] Jilin Provincial Academy of Forestry Science, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Wildlife and Biodiversity in Changbai Mountain, Changchun
[3] Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park Administration Wangqing Suboffice, Wangqing National Nature Reserve Administration, Wangqing
来源
Linye Kexue/Scientia Silvae Sinicae | 2019年 / 55卷 / 05期
关键词
Camera trap; Panthera pardus orientalis; Population density evaluation; Spatiotemporal patterns; Wild animal;
D O I
10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190521
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Far Eastern Leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) disperses in the northernmost region and maintains the minimum population of Panthera pardus subspecies. It is evaluated as Critical Endangered in IUCN Red List. In this study, we analyzed long-term dynamic of population size and distribution of Far Eastern Leopard in Wangqing Nature Reserve and expected to provide scientific data for the protection of this endangered species. Method: From Autumn 2013 to Autumn 2017, cameras were set up with a density of 1 pair per 3 km×3 km grid in the main leopard habitat in Wangqing Nature Reserve. The relative abundance indices (RAI) was used to calculate leopard abundance, the distribution area was defined by 99% kernel density contour, and individual was identified in Extract Compare software. The closure test, model selection and population estimation were performed for the data of effective monitoring period with CAPTURE software. The effective trapping area was estimated by projecting an 8 km radius buffer around each camera trap location. Then we calculated population density using effective trapping area. Result: The RAI of leopard varied from 0.34 to 2.12 during 9 monitoring seasons. The distribution area of leopard was 201 km2 in Autumn 2013 and 992 km2 in Autumn 2017. A total of 9 individuals were identified, including 3 females, 3 males, 2 cubs and 1 unrecognizable. Both the value and the power of CAPTURE closure test were low when population size was small. The model selection criterions of Mh (heterogeneity effects model) were highest in 4 monitoring seasons, and second only after M0 (null model) in the other 5 seasons. The goodness of fit tests of M0 vs Mb(behaviour effects model) and M0 vs Mt(time effects model)showed that there were no significant differences between groups. The population density of leopard ranged from 0.12 to 0.88 individual per 100 km2 during research period. The value of captured individual/estimated population size was relatively high in general, albeit there was a low value of 0.43 in Spring 2017. Conclusion: The distribution pattern of leopard obviously showed spatiotemporal heterogeneity due to geographic variance and prey abundance fluctuation. CAPTURE closed population test was ineffective for small sample test. Mh model was proper to evaluate leopard population. The capture rates showed no variance after trap or in different trap occasions. Leopard population density would be overestimated due to trap-shy response. © 2019, Editorial Department of Scientia Silvae Sinicae. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 196
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [11] Gavashelishvili A., Lukarevskiy V., Modeling the habitat requirements of leopard Panthera pardus in west and central Asia, J Appl Ecol, 45, 2, pp. 579-588, (2008)
  • [12] Harmsen B.J., The use of camera traps for estimating abundance and studying the ecology of jaguars (Panthera onca), (2006)
  • [13] Hawthorne L.B., Geospatial Modelling Environment, version 0.7.3
  • [14] Hebblewhite M., Miquelle D.G., Murzin A.A., Et al., Predicting potential habitat and population size for reintroduction of the Far Eastern leopards in the Russian Far East, Biological Conservation, 144, 10, pp. 2403-2413, (2011)
  • [15] Jackson P., Nowell K., Panthera pardus ssp. orientalis, IUCN 2010
  • [16] Jiang G., Qi J., Wang G., Et al., New hope for the survival of the Amur leopard in China, Scientific Reports, 5, (2015)
  • [17] Karanth K.U., Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models, Biological Conservation, 71, 3, pp. 333-338, (1995)
  • [18] Karanth K.U., Nichols J.D., Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures, Ecology, 79, 8, pp. 2852-2862, (1998)
  • [19] Kawanishi K., Sunquist M.E., Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia, Biological Conservation, 120, 3, pp. 329-344, (2004)
  • [20] Kelly M.J., Noss A.J., Di Bitetti M.S., Et al., Estimating puma densities from camera trapping across three study sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize, Journal of Mammalogy, 89, 2, pp. 408-418, (2008)