Coordination contracts for supply chain considering supply disruption and loss aversion

被引:0
|
作者
Yan, Jin [1 ]
Zheng, Guohua [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha,410075, China
关键词
Sales - Decision making - Investments - Optimal systems;
D O I
10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.T20190397
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is supposed that demand is affected by the level of supplier innovation input. In the two-level supply chain consisting of two manufacturers and one retailer, the coordination of the supply chain was studied by considering supplier supply disruption risk and retailer loss aversion. The optimal strategies and coordination of supply chain were analyzed under the decentralized decision-making and the centralized decision-making respectively; meanwhile, the influence of innovation input and order quantity on supply chain collaboration was presented. The supply chain coordination contract model was constructed based on the option contract coordination with innovation investment sharing. The results show the supplier innovation input level strictly increases with retailer’s order quantity, and the retailer’s order quantity strictly increases with the supplier’s innovation input level. Supply chain can be coordinated while the option order price, option exercise price and innovation investment sharing ratio meet certain conditions. Finally, numerical examples were used to verify the effectiveness of the model. The impacts of the changes of the parameters in the model on the optimal strategies were revealed, and the parameters include loss aversion and supply disruption risk. Through the analysis, the relationship between contract coordination parameters and the profit distribution mode of supply chain under different combinations of contract parameters were shown. © 2020, Central South University Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 508
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Disruption Coordination of Complicated Supply Chain Based on AWQD
    Qu, Linbo
    Zhao, Lindu
    Han, Ruizhu
    2008 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 32 - 37
  • [42] Supply chain coordination under asymmetric risk aversion information
    Tian, Yu
    Huang, Dao
    Liu, Dong Bo
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 1504 - 1509
  • [43] NEV supply chain coordination and sustainability considering sales effort and risk aversion under the CVaR criterion
    Han, Shifeng
    Xu, Xingzhong
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [44] Coordination contract design for a two-echelon supply chain considering risk aversion and yield uncertainties
    Cai, Jianhu
    Cao, Zhengang
    Zhang, Xiaoyang
    Jia, Lishuang
    Xu, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [45] Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities
    Hong, Zhaofu
    Guo, Xiaolong
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 83 : 155 - 166
  • [46] Supply chain coordination with put option contracts and customer returns
    Wang, Chong
    Chen, Jing
    Wang, Lili
    Luo, Jiarong
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2020, 71 (06) : 1003 - 1019
  • [47] The Effect of Buyback Contracts on the Coordination of Car Rental Supply Chain
    Hou Linlin
    Quan Tao
    2011 30TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2011, : 5789 - 5793
  • [48] Supply chain coordination with contracts game between complementary suppliers
    Ding, Ding
    Chen, Jian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2007, 6 (01) : 163 - 175
  • [49] Research on supply chain coordination mechanism considering the social responsibility practices of the upstream supply chain
    Lai H.
    Zhou Y.
    Chen X.
    Hu C.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2023, 43 (09): : 2502 - 2516
  • [50] Supply Chain Coordination by Contracts with Inventory Holding Cost Share
    Gomez-Padilla, Alejandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 2 (02) : 36 - 47