Reaction behaviors and feed characterization of light hydrocarbon catalytic pyrolysis for production of light olefins

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang R. [1 ]
Liu G. [1 ]
Wang Y. [1 ]
Liu H. [1 ]
Liu Z. [1 ]
Meng X. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing
来源
Meng, Xianghai (mengxh@cup.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Materials China卷 / 67期
关键词
Catalysis; Chemical reaction; Ethylene; Fixed-bed; Light hydrocarbon; Propylene; Pyrolysis;
D O I
10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160398
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The cracking performance of light hydrocarbon model compounds such as n-paraffins, i-paraffins, naphthalenes, aromatics and n-olefins on a mesoporous catalyst based on ZSM-5 molecular sieve was investigated in a small scale fixed bed reactor. The experimental results showed that the cracking performance in the order from good to poor was: n-olefins, n-paraffins, naphthalenes, i-paraffins, and aromatics. For n-paraffins, i-paraffins and naphthalenes, the yields of total light olefins were largely different whereas the selectivities of total light olefins were all around 56.57%. The main liquid components were pentene, benzene, toluene and xylene besides unreacted feed. In case of straight-run naphtha, the yield of ethylene plus propylene and the yield of total light olefins increased with the increase in reaction temperature and the decrease in weight hourly space velocity. At a condition of reaction temperature of 680℃, a weight hourly space velocity of 4.32 h-1 and a steam-to-oil weight ratio of 0.35, naphtha catalytic pyrolysis yielded 41.94% (mass) of total light olefins and 35.87% (mass) of ethylene plus propylene, which the ratio of propylene to ethylene at above 1.2 was much higher than that of naphtha steam cracking. A large amount of olefins and paraffins in the liquid sample of naphtha catalytic pyrolysis indicated that the liquid sample still had good cracking performance. A new characterization parameter (KF), a function of H/C atomic ratio, relative density and molecular weight of feeds, was proposed to be more suitable than KCP for characterizing catalytic pyrolysis of light hydrocarbons. © All Right Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3387 / 3393
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] Meng X.H., Xu C.M., Gao J.S., Et al., Catalytic and thermal pyrolysis of atmospheric residue, Energy Fuels, 23, 1, pp. 65-69, (2009)
  • [12] Liu J.T., Sun F.X., Teng J.W., Thermodynamics analysis and reaction performance for catalytic cracking of C<sub>4</sub> olefins to propylene and ethylene, Industrial Catalysis, 23, 6, pp. 486-490, (2015)
  • [13] Jiang G.Y., Zhang L., Zhao Z., Et al., Highly effective P-modified HZSM-5 catalyst for the cracking of C<sub>4</sub> alkanes to produce light olefins, Appl. Catal. A-Gen., 340, 2, pp. 176-182, (2008)
  • [14] Siddiqui M.A.B., Aitani A.M., Saeed M.R., Et al., Enhancing the production of light olefins by catalytic cracking of FCC naphtha over mesoporous ZSM-5 catalyst, Top. Catal., 53, 19-20, pp. 1387-1393, (2010)
  • [15] Liu W.K., Meng X.H., Zhao X., Et al., Pyrolysis performances of catalytic cracking naphtha and coker naphtha on inert carriers and an active catalyst, Energy Fuels, 23, 12, pp. 5760-5764, (2009)
  • [16] Yang L.G., Xu C.M., Meng X.H., Et al., Catalytic pyrolysis of coker naphtha for production of light olefins, Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 38, 3, pp. 4-8, (2008)
  • [17] Le Van Mao R., Muntasar A., Yan H.T., Et al., Catalytic cracking of heavy olefins into propylene, ethylene and other light olefins, Catal. Lett., 130, 1-2, pp. 86-92, (2009)
  • [18] Pant K.K., Kunzru D., Catalytic pyrolysis of n-heptane on unpromoted and potassium promoted calcium aluminates, Chem. Eng. J., 87, 2, pp. 219-225, (2002)
  • [19] Nawaz Z., Tang X., Wei F., Hexene catalytic cracking over 30% SAPO-34 catalyst for propylene maximization: influence of reaction conditions and reaction pathway exploration, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 26, 4, pp. 705-712, (2009)
  • [20] Yu S., Zhang J.S., Wei X.L., Exploration and analysis on ethylene and propylene formation in naphthene catalytic cracking, Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 29, 3, pp. 475-481, (2013)