Enhancing Precision in Cardiac Segmentation for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy Through Deep Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Summerfield, Nicholas [1 ]
Morris, Eric [3 ]
Banerjee, Soumyanil [4 ]
He, Qisheng [4 ]
Ghanem, Ahmed I. [5 ,6 ]
Zhu, Simeng [7 ]
Zhao, Jiwei [8 ]
Dong, Ming [4 ]
Glide-Hurst, Carri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Washington Univ Med St Louis, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Henry Ford Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Alexandria Univ, Fac Med, Alexandria Dept Clin Oncol, Alexandria, Egypt
[7] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Columbus, OH USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
AUTO-SEGMENTATION; WHOLE HEART; ATLAS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cardiac substructure dose metrics are more strongly linked to late cardiac morbidities than to whole-heart metrics. Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided - guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) enables substructure visualization during daily localization, allowing potential for enhanced cardiac sparing. We extend a publicly available state-of-the-art deep learning framework, " No New" U-Net, to incorporate self-distillation (nnU-Net.wSD) for substructure segmentation for MRgRT. Methods and Materials: Eighteen (institute A) patients who underwent thoracic or abdominal radiation therapy on a 0.35 T MR-guided linear accelerator were retrospectively evaluated. On each image, 1 of 2 radiation oncologists delineated reference contours of 12 cardiac substructures (chambers, great vessels, and coronary arteries) used to train (n = 10), validate (n = 3), and test (n = 5) nnU-Net.wSD by leveraging a teacher-student network and comparing it to standard 3-dimensional U-Net. The impact of using simulation data or including 3 to 4 daily images for augmentation during training was evaluated for nnU-Net.wSD. Geometric metrics (Dice similarity coefficient, fi cient, mean distance to agreement, and 95% Hausdorff distance), visual inspection, and clinical dose-volume histograms were evaluated. To determine generalizability, institute A's ' s model was tested on an unlabeled data set from institute B (n = 22) and evaluated via consensus scoring and volume comparisons. Results: nnU-Net.wSD yielded a Dice similarity coefficient (reported mean f SD) of 0.65 f 0.25 across the 12 substructures (chambers, 0.85 f 0.05; great vessels, 0.67 f 0.19; and coronary arteries, 0.33 f 0.16; mean distance to agreement, < 3 mm; mean 95% Hausdorff distance, < 9 mm) while outperforming the 3-dimensional U-Net (0.583 f 0.28; P < .01). Leveraging fractionated data for augmentation improved over a single MR simulation time point (0.579 <section> 0.29; P < .01). Predicted contours yielded dose-volume histograms that closely matched those of the clinical treatment plans where mean and maximum (ie, dose to 0.03 cc) doses deviated by 0.32 <section> 0.5 Gy and 1.42 2.6 Gy, respectively. There were no statistically significant fi cant differences between institute A and B volumes (P > .05) for 11 of 12 substructures, with larger volumes requiring minor changes and coronary arteries exhibiting more variability. Conclusions: This work is a critical step toward rapid and reliable cardiac substructure segmentation to improve cardiac sparing in low-field fi eld MRgRT. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 914
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A New Era of Image Guidance with Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiation Therapy for Abdominal and Thoracic Malignancies
    Mittauer, Kathryn
    Paliwal, Bhudatt
    Hill, Patrick
    Bayouth, John E.
    Geurts, Mark W.
    Baschnagel, Andrew M.
    Bradley, Kristin A.
    Harari, Paul M.
    Rosenberg, Stephen
    Brower, Jeffrey V.
    Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P.
    Hullett, Craig
    Bayliss, R. A.
    Labby, Zacariah E.
    Bassetti, Michael F.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (04):
  • [22] Cardiac Segmentation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data with Deep Learning Methods
    Razumov, A. A.
    Tya-Shen-Tin, Y. N.
    Ushenin, K. S.
    PHYSICS, TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION (PTI-2019), 2019, 2174
  • [23] Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided External Beam Radiation Therapy for Consolidation in Recurrent Cervical Cancer
    Felici, Felix
    Benkreira, Mohamed
    Lambaudie, Eric
    Fau, Pierre
    Mailleux, Hugues
    Ferre, Marjorie
    Gonzague-Casabianca, Laurence
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (06)
  • [24] Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Locally-recurrent Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Kang, Kylie
    Lattin, John
    Schiff, Joshua
    Green, Olga
    Price, Alex
    Yang, Deshan
    Hawkins, William
    Fields, Ryan
    Samson, Pamela
    Badiyan, Shahed
    Henke, Lauren
    Kim, Hyun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 44 (10): : S54 - S54
  • [25] Polymer Gels as 3D QA Devices in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy
    Roed, Y.
    Kadbi, M.
    Wang, J.
    Pinsky, L.
    Ibbott, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3661 - 3662
  • [26] Improving background suppression in magnetic resonance-guided endovascular therapy
    Draper, J
    Lauzon, M
    Frayne, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (07) : 2408 - 2409
  • [27] Magnetic Resonance-Guided Passive Catheter Tracking for Endovascular Therapy
    Settecase, Fabio
    Martin, Alastair J.
    Lillaney, Prasheel
    Losey, Aaron
    Hetts, Steven W.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 23 (04) : 591 - +
  • [28] Magnetic resonance-guided laparoscopic interstitial laser therapy of the liver
    Klotz, HP
    Flury, R
    Erhart, P
    Steiner, P
    Debatin, JF
    Uhlschmid, G
    Largiader, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (04): : 448 - 451
  • [29] Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging responses in head and neck cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance-guided hypofractionated radiation therapy
    Bonate, Ryan
    Awan, Musaddiq J.
    Himburg, Heather A.
    Wong, Stuart
    Shukla, Monica
    Tarima, Sergey
    Zenga, Joseph
    Paulson, Eric S.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33
  • [30] Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy of Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device on a 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance-Linac
    Yang, Bin
    Yuan, Jing
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Huang, Chen-Yu
    Poon, Darren M. C.
    Yu, Siu Ki
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12 (01) : E56 - E61