Review and techno-economic analysis of coal pyrolysis to liquid and oil shale to liquid processes

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng S. [1 ]
Zhou H. [1 ]
Qian Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, Guangdong
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2017年 / 68卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal; Fuel oil; Oil shale; Pyrolysis; Techno-economic analysis;
D O I
10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170544
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recently, coal pyrolysis to liquid (CPTL) process and oil shale to liquid (STL) process have developed rapidly for the strategic reserve of energy. This paper reviews major technologies of CPTL and STL process, then compares the two processes from aspects of techno-economic. Result shows that CPTL process consumes 11.4 tonnes low-rank coal per tonne fuel oil while STL process needs 24.5 tonnes oil shale correspondingly; meanwhile, water consumption of CPTL process is 1.4 times than that of STL process. Economic performance shows that the total capital investment of CPTL process is 6510 CNY·t-1 fuel oil while STL process is 5716 CNY·t-1 fuel oil; however, the production cost of CPTL process is 3887 CNY·t-1 fuel oil while STL process costs 4217 CNY·t-1 fuel oil; also, calculating results indicate that the break-even crude oil price of CPTL process and STL process fluctuate at 59-68 USD·bbl-1 and 71-76 USD·bbl-1 separately. Generally speaking, it is necessary to improve and consummate relevant techniques or prolong downstream industrial chain, we can seek a breakthrough from retorting, system integration, comprehensive utilization and poly-generation etc. © All Right Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3658 / 3668
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Yi Q., Feng J., Lu B.C., Et al., Energy evaluation for lignite pyrolysis by solid heat carrier coupled with gasification, Energy & Fuels, 27, 8, pp. 4523-4533, (2013)
  • [32] Chi Y.L., Li S.Y., Yue C.T., Advances in process and utilization of shale oil, Modern Chemical Industry, 25, pp. 44-46, (2005)
  • [33] Liu C.S., Chen J.Y., Lin M., Some characteristics of oil shale in China, Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 8, 2, pp. 103-107, (1992)
  • [34] Yang Q.C., Qian Y., Wang Y.J., Et al., Development of an oil shale retorting process integrated with chemical looping for hydrogen production, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 54, 23, pp. 6156-6164, (2015)
  • [35] Yang S.Y., Zhang J., Yang Q.C., Et al., Development of an integrated oil shale refinery with retorting gas steam reforming for hydrogen production, Energy & Fuels, 28, 8, pp. 5557-5564, (2014)
  • [36] Gong M.H., Yi Q., Huang Y., Et al., Coke oven gas to methanol process integrated with CO<sub>2</sub> recycle for high energy efficiency, economic benefits and low emissions, Energy Conversion and Management, 133, pp. 318-331, (2017)
  • [37] Chen H.J., Liu Z.J., Zhu J.W., Et al., Economic evaluation of oil shale utilization, Geology and Resources, 20, 1, pp. 50-55, (2011)
  • [38] Lu Y.J., Zhao L., Guo L.J., Technical and economic evaluation of solar hydrogen production by supercritical water gasification of biomass in China, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 22, pp. 14349-14359, (2011)
  • [39] Xiang D., Yang S.Y., Qian Y., Techno-economic analysis and comparison of coal based olefins processes, Energy Conversion and Management, 110, pp. 33-41, (2016)
  • [40] Gu W., Cai L.J., Zhang X.T., Affecting factors and analysis about coal liquefaction project economical efficiency, Shenhua Science and Technology, 14, 4, pp. 12-16, (2016)