Evaluation of swat soil water estimation accuracy using data from indiana, colorado, and texas

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem A.A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Engel B.A. [3 ]
Marek G.W. [4 ]
Moorhead J.E. [4 ]
Flanagan D.C. [5 ]
Rashad M. [2 ,6 ]
Radwan S. [2 ,6 ]
Bralts V.F. [3 ]
Gowda P.H. [7 ]
机构
[1] College of Agriculture, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR
[2] Department of Agricultural Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia
[3] Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
[4] USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX
[5] USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, IN
[6] Department of Agricultural Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia
[7] USDAARS South East, Stoneville, MS
来源
Transactions of the ASABE | 2020年 / 63卷 / 06期
关键词
Hydrologic modeling; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Soil moisture; Soil moisture sensor; Soil water;
D O I
10.13031/TRANS13910.
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil water content (SWC) is a challenging measurement at the field, watershed, and regional scales. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) soil water estimates were evaluated at three locations: The St. Joseph River watershed (SJRW) in northeast Indiana, the USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory (CPRL) at Bushland, Texas, and the USDA-ARS Limited Irrigation Research Farm (LIFR) at Greeley, Colorado. The soil water estimates were evaluated under two scenarios: (1) for the defined soil profile, and (2) by individual layer. Each site's soil water assessment was performed based on the existing management conditions during each experiment, whether dryland or irrigated, and for various periods depending on SWC measurement availability at each site. The SWAT soil water was evaluated as follows: The Indiana site was evaluated under dryland conditions using daily soil water observations for one year; the Texas site was evaluated for a ten-year period under irrigated and dryland conditions using weekly soil water observations from four lysimeters; and the Colorado site was evaluated under irrigated conditions for a four-year period. The simulated soil water was evaluated by comparing the model simulations with observed daily and weekly soil water measurements at the three sites. Based on the results, even though all the SWAT models were considered to perform as good models following calibration (streamflow, ET, etc.), the soil water simulations were unacceptable for the defined soil profile and for individual layers at the three sites. Deeper soil layers had observations greater than field capacity values, indicating poor soil parameterization. The dryland model had greater water content than the irrigated model, contradicting the soil water measurements. This greater soil water simulation with the dryland model is a result of SWAT model uncertainties with ET reduction under dryland conditions due to water stress. This study indicated that soil water estimation using the default SWAT soil water equations has many sources of uncertainties. Two apparent sources resulted in the SWAT model's poor performance: (1) SWAT soil water routines that do not fully represent soil water moving between layers to meet plant demand and (2) uncertainty in soil parameterization. © 2020 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:1827 / 1843
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions
    Geza, Mengistu
    McCray, John E.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) : 393 - 406
  • [22] SURFACE RUNOFF AND SOIL EROSION ESTIMATION USING THE SWAT MODEL IN THE KELETA WATERSHED, ETHIOPIA
    Tibebe, D.
    Bewket, W.
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 22 (06) : 551 - 564
  • [23] Evaluation of soil erosion in Northern Algeria watershed using SWAT and RUSLE models
    Salhi, Chahrazed
    Touaibia, Benina
    Zeroual, Ayoub
    Benblida, Nadjia
    Assani, Ali
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (26) : 11559 - 11589
  • [24] Estimation of Sediment Yield and Evaluation of Management Options in the Watershed Using SWAT Model
    Tenaw, Wasihun Gashu
    Tadesse, Kassahun Birhanu
    Kerebih, Mulu Sewinet
    AIR SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 17
  • [25] Testing soil water retention estimation with the MUUF pedotransfer model using data from the southern United States
    Rawls, WJ
    Pachepsky, Y
    Shen, MH
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 251 (3-4) : 177 - 185
  • [26] Characterization of drought in Texas using NLDAS soil moisture data
    Sullivan Jr., John R.
    Technical (Online) Report - University of Texas at Austin, Center for Research in Water Resources, 2013, 13 (03): : 1 - 92
  • [27] Evaluation of Power Line Parameter Estimation Accuracy Based on Data from Airborne LiDAR
    Siranec, Marek
    Hoger, Marek
    Otcenasova, Alena
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRICAL POWER ENGINEERING (ELEKTROENERGETIKA 2019), 2019, : 504 - 509
  • [28] Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Soil Water Content at a Regional Scale Using Remote Sensing Data
    Chen, He
    Wei, Zheng
    Lin, Rencai
    Cai, Jiabing
    Han, Congying
    WATER, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [29] Runoff estimation from a small agricultural watershed using SWAT model
    Tripathi, MP
    Panda, RK
    Raghuwanshi, NS
    HYDROLOGIC MODELING, 1999, : 143 - 152
  • [30] Soil water estimation using electromagnetic induction
    Akbar, MA
    Kenimer, AL
    Searcy, SW
    Torbert, HA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2005, 48 (01): : 129 - 135