Prediction and assessment of meteorological drought in southwest China using long short-term memory model

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiehui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jia, Hejia [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Xiao, Tiangui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Informat Technol, Sch Atmospher Sci, Chengdu 610225, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Informat Technol, Yunnan R&D Inst Nat Disaster, Kunming 650034, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Key Open Lab Arid Climate Change & Disaster Reduci, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Xianning Meteorol Serv, Xianning 437000, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN GEOSCIENCES | 2024年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
drought prediction; drought assessment; SPEI; LSTM model; RF model; southwest China; SPEI; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1515/geo-2022-0708
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Drought prediction is crucial for mitigating risks and designing measures to alleviate its impact. Machine learning models have been widely applied in the field of drought prediction in recent years. This study concentrated on predicting meteorological droughts in southwest China, a region prone to frequent and severe droughts, particularly in areas with sparse meteorological station coverage. The long short-term memory (LSTM) predictive model, which is a deep learning model, was constructed by calculating standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) values based on 144 weather station observations from 1980 to 2020. The 5-fold cross-validation method was used for the hyperparameter optimization of the model. The LSTM model underwent comprehensive assessment and validation through multiple methods. This included the use of several accuracy assessment indicators and a comparison of results. The comparison covered different drought characteristics among the LSTM predictive model, the benchmark random forest (RF) predictive model, the historical drought situations, and the calculated SPEI values based on observations from 144 weather stations. The results showed that the training results of the LSTM predictive model basically agreed with the SPEI values calculated from weather station observations. The model-predicted variation trend of SPEI values for 2020 was similar to the variation in SPEI values calculated based on weather station observations. On the test set, the coefficient of determination (R 2), the root mean square error, the explained variance score, the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, and the Kling-Gupta efficiency were 0.757, 0.210, 0.802, 0.761, and 0.212, respectively. The total consistency rate of the drought grade was 59.26%. The spatial correlation distribution of SPEI values between LSTM model prediction and calculation from meteorological stations in 2020 was more than 0.5 for most regions. The correlation coefficients exceeded 0.6 in western Tibet and Chengdu Plains. Compared to the RF model, the LSTM model excelled in all five performance evaluation metrics and demonstrated a higher overall consistency rate for drought categories. The Kruskal-Wallis test for both the LSTM and RF models all indicated no significant difference in the distributions between the predicted and observed data. Scatter plots revealed that the prediction accuracy for both models in 2020 was suboptimal, with the SPEI showing a comparatively narrow range of values. Nonetheless, the LSTM model significantly outperformed the RF model in terms of prediction accuracy. In summary, the LSTM model demonstrated good overall performance, accuracy, and applicability. It has the potential to enhance dynamic drought prediction in regions with complex terrain, diverse climatic factors, and sparse weather station networks.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review on the long short-term memory model
    Greg Van Houdt
    Carlos Mosquera
    Gonzalo Nápoles
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2020, 53 : 5929 - 5955
  • [42] Stocks Prices Prediction with Long Short-term Memory
    Aksehir, Zinnet Duygu
    Kilic, Erdal
    Akleylek, Sedat
    Dongul, Mesut
    Coskun, Burak
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS, BIG DATA AND SECURITY (IOTBDS), 2020, : 221 - 226
  • [43] Earthquake vulnerability assessment for the Indian subcontinent using the Long Short-Term Memory model (LSTM)
    Jena, Ratiranjan
    Naik, Sambit Prasanajit
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Beydoun, Ghassan
    Park, Hyuck-Jin
    Alamri, Abdullah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 66
  • [44] RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Long Short-Term Memory Model
    Wu, Hongjie
    Tang, Ye
    Lu, Weizhong
    Chen, Cheng
    Huang, Hongmei
    Fu, Qiming
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING THEORIES AND APPLICATION, PT I, 2018, 10954 : 595 - 599
  • [45] Approach and Landing Energy Prediction Based on a Long Short-Term Memory Model
    Hu, Yahui
    Yan, Jiaqi
    Cao, Ertai
    Yu, Yimeng
    Tian, Haiming
    Huang, Heyuan
    AEROSPACE, 2024, 11 (03)
  • [46] NEWLSTM: An Optimized Long Short-Term Memory Language Model for Sequence Prediction
    Wang, Qing
    Peng, Rong-Qun
    Wang, Jia-Qiang
    Li, Zhi
    Qu, Han-Bing
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 65395 - 65401
  • [47] A long short-term memory-based model for greenhouse climate prediction
    Liu, Yuwen
    Li, Dejuan
    Wan, Shaohua
    Wang, Fan
    Dou, Wanchun
    Xu, Xiaolong
    Li, Shancang
    Ma, Rui
    Qi, Lianyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 37 (01) : 135 - 151
  • [48] A novel prediction model of grounding resistance based on long short-term memory
    Pu, Xinghai
    Zhang, Jing
    Wang, Fei
    Xue, Shuai
    AIP ADVANCES, 2025, 15 (01)
  • [49] A Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network Based Prediction Model
    Tian, Y. H.
    Wu, Q.
    Zhang, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2020, 15 (05) : 1 - 12
  • [50] Prediction of agricultural drought behavior using the Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM) in the central area of the Gulf of Mexico
    Salas-Martinez, Fernando
    Marquez-Grajales, Aldo
    Valdes-Rodriguez, Ofelia-Andrea
    Palacios-Wassenaar, Olivia-Margarita
    Perez-Castro, Nancy
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 155 (08) : 7887 - 7907