共 50 条
Design and performance of a compact lightweight hybrid thermal management system using phase change material and liquid cooling with a honeycomb-like structure for prismatic lithium-ion batteries
被引:12
|作者:
Pu, Jin Huan
[1
,2
]
Li, Yuan
[2
]
Li, Rui Chuang
[2
]
Hua, Nan
[3
]
Zhang, Huan
[4
]
Lu, Yucheng
[4
]
Panchal, Satyam
[5
]
Fraser, Roydon
[5
]
Fowler, Michael
[6
]
Zhang, Xuan-Kai
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Shandong Univ, Inst Adv Technol, Jinan 250061, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Inst Thermal Sci & Technol, Jinan 250061, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Beihang Univ, Ningbo Inst Technol, Ningbo 315832, Peoples R China
[4] China Huaneng Grp Co Ltd, Beijing 102209, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Waterloo, Mech & Mechatron Engn Dept, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[6] Univ Waterloo, Chem Engn Dept, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Lithium-ion battery;
Hybrid battery thermal management system;
Honeycomb-like design;
Phase change materials;
Liquid cooling;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235632
中图分类号:
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号:
070304 ;
081704 ;
摘要:
This study presents a compact and lightweight hybrid battery thermal management system (BTMS) that integrates phase change materials (PCM) with liquid cooling in a honeycomb-like configuration, specifically designed for prismatic lithium-ion batteries. A validated mathematical model compared various PCM cell shapes within the hybrid BTMS, evaluating thermal distribution and the influence of key operating parameters. Findings reveal that PCM cell shape minimally impacts temperature control but significantly affects pressure drop and performance evaluation criteria (PEC). Design 1, with a hexagonal PCM configuration, exhibited the highest comprehensive heat transfer performance, with PEC values 30.7 % higher than Design 2 and 7.8 % higher than Design 3. The hybrid BTMS reduced battery temperature and system mass by 15.3 % compared to liquid cooling BTMS. During steady PCM melting, coolant mass flow rate m co minimally impacted maximum temperature T max and temperature difference Delta T max , with both parameters remaining constant. Increasing m co from 0.2 g s- 1 to 0.8 g s- 1 , reduced T max and Delta T max by 10.7 K and 9.8 K, respectively. Inlet coolant temperature T in showed similar trends for T max but differed for Delta T max . As T in decreased from 303.0 K to 298.0 K, T max decreased by 1.2 % but Delta T max increased by 13.1 %. 2C and 3C discharge rates kept T max below 313 K, with 2C maintaining Delta T max within the required 5 K limit.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文