Communicating Uncertainty in Digital Humanities Visualization Research

被引:3
|
作者
Panagiotidou G. [1 ,2 ]
Lamqaddam H. [1 ]
Poblome J. [1 ]
Brosens K. [1 ]
Verbert K. [1 ]
Vande Moere A. [1 ]
机构
[1] KU Leuven, Belgium
[2] UCL Interaction Center, Belgium
关键词
data visualization; digital humanities; review; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209436
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to their historical nature, humanistic data encompass multiple sources of uncertainty. While humanists are accustomed to handling such uncertainty with their established methods, they are cautious of visualizations that appear overly objective and fail to communicate this uncertainty. To design more trustworthy visualizations for humanistic research, therefore, a deeper understanding of its relation to uncertainty is needed. We systematically reviewed 126 publications from digital humanities literature that use visualization as part of their research process, and examined how uncertainty was handled and represented in their visualizations. Crossing these dimensions with the visualization type and use, we identified that uncertainty originated from multiple steps in the research process from the source artifacts to their datafication. We also noted how besides known uncertainty coping strategies, such as excluding data and evaluating its effects, humanists also embraced uncertainty as a separate dimension important to retain. By mapping how the visualizations encoded uncertainty, we identified four approaches that varied in terms of explicitness and customization. This work contributes with two empirical taxonomies of uncertainty and it's corresponding coping strategies, as well as with the foundation of a research agenda for uncertainty visualization in the digital humanities. Our findings further the synergy among humanists and visualization researchers, and ultimately contribute to the development of more trustworthy, uncertainty-aware visualizations. © 2022 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 645
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Collaboration in Digital Humanities Research - Persisting Silences
    Griffin, Gabriele
    Hayler, Matt Steven
    DIGITAL HUMANITIES QUARTERLY, 2018, 12 (01):
  • [42] Exploring Research Focus Association in Digital Humanities
    Su, Hsin-Ning
    Chou, Yang-Tai
    2017 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2017,
  • [43] Digital texts (Archival research, humanities scholarship)
    McGann, J
    PERFORMANCE RESEARCH, 2002, 7 (01) : 23 - 23
  • [44] An examination of the physical and the digital qualities of humanities research
    Rimmer, Jon
    Warwick, Claire
    Blandford, Ann
    Gow, Jeremy
    Buchanan, George
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (03) : 1374 - 1392
  • [45] Modeling Digital Humanities Collections as Research Objects
    Fenlon, Katrina
    2019 ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES (JCDL 2019), 2019, : 138 - 147
  • [46] RETRACTED: Research on the Development Path of Cultural Heritage Information Visualization from the Perspective of Digital Humanities (Retracted Article)
    Fang, Xixi
    MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [47] Current status of digital humanities research in Taiwan
    Pan Yuting
    Jiang Yinfeng
    Zhang Jingli
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [48] Historical Basic Research in Romania and Digital Humanities
    Dinca, Adinel C.
    RETI MEDIEVALI RIVISTA, 2019, 20 (01): : 41 - 52
  • [49] DIGITAL HUMANITIES: ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS AND INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH
    Galina, Mozhaeva V.
    Polina, Mozhaeva Renha N.
    Vsevolod, Serbin A.
    TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2014, (389): : 73 - 81
  • [50] Humanities scholarship, the research library and the digital library
    Sturges, P
    Sambrook, J
    DIGITAL LIBRARIES: INTERDISCIPLINARY CONCEPTS, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, COLIS3 PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 63 - 72