Shifting forms of Engagement: Volunteer Learning in Online Citizen Science

被引:6
|
作者
Jackson C.B. [1 ]
Østerlund C. [2 ]
Crowston K. [2 ]
Harandi M. [2 ]
Trouille L. [3 ]
机构
[1] University of California, Berkeley and Syracuse University, Berkeley
[2] Syracuse University, Syracuse
[3] Adler Planetarium, Chicago
来源
| 1600年 / Association for Computing Machinery, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701, United States卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
citizen science; learning; user behavior;
D O I
10.1145/3392841
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Peer production projects involve people in many tasks, from editing articles to analyzing datasets. To facilitate mastery of these practices, projects offer a number of learning resources, ranging from project-defined FAQsto individually-oriented search tools and communal discussion boards. However, it is not clear which project resources best support participant learning, overall and at different stages of engagement. We draw onSørensen's framework of forms of presence to distinguish three types of engagement with learning resources:authoritative, agent-centered and communal. We assigned resources from the Gravity Spy citizen-science into these three categories and analyzed trace data recording interactions with resources using a mixed-effects logistic regression with volunteer performance as an outcome variable. The findings suggest that engagement with authoritative resources (e.g., those constructed by project organizers) facilitates performance initially. However, as tasks become more difficult, volunteers seek and benefit from engagement with their own agent-centered resources and community-generated resources. These findings suggest a broader scope for the design of learning resources for peer production. © 2020 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Engagement styles in an environmental citizen science project
    Golumbic, Yaela
    Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
    Fishbain, Barak
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2020, 19 (06):
  • [22] Citizen science in developing countries: how to improve volunteer participation
    Requier, Fabrice
    Andersson, Georg K. S.
    Oddi, Facundo J.
    Garibaldi, Lucas A.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 18 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [23] Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science, and Public Engagement
    Sorensen, Karen Schroeder
    RHETORIC & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2020, 23 (04) : 764 - 766
  • [24] Exploring scientists? perceptions of citizen science for public engagement with science
    Collins, Stephanie A.
    Sullivan, Miriam
    Bray, Heather J.
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2022, 21 (07):
  • [25] Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science, and Public Engagement
    Walker, Kenneth
    RHETORIC SOCIETY QUARTERLY, 2017, 47 (05) : 486 - 489
  • [26] Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science, and Public Engagement
    Mericle, Megan
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 2020, 106 (02) : 219 - 223
  • [27] The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms
    Newman, Greg
    Wiggins, Andrea
    Crall, Alycia
    Graham, Eric
    Newman, Sarah
    Crowston, Kevin
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (06) : 298 - 304
  • [28] Science Gamers, Citizen Scientists, and Dabblers: Characterizing Player Engagement in Two Citizen Science Games
    Tang, Jian
    Prestopnik, Nathan R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2023, 39 (08) : 1690 - 1711
  • [29] 'Citizen identification': online learning supports highly accurate species identification for insect-focussed citizen science
    Perry, Jessica R.
    Sumner, Seirian
    Thompson, Cris
    Hart, Adam G.
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2021, 14 (06) : 862 - 867
  • [30] Dialoguecircles - A Case Study in Successful Online Citizen Engagement
    Timms, Kevin
    Pal, Shibu
    Ji, Shaobo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNMENT, 2008, : 441 - 453