Logistics unmanned aerial vehicle flight plan pre-allocation in urban low-altitude airspace

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang H. [1 ]
Ren Z. [1 ]
Feng O. [1 ]
Wang F. [1 ]
Liu H. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
来源
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2023年 / 45卷 / 09期
关键词
air transportation; comprehensive priority; flight plan allocation; logistics unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV);
D O I
10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.09.19
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In view of the problem of logistics unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight plan allocation in urban environment, with the goal of minimizing UAV transportation cost and delay cost, a multi-constraint logistics UAV flight plan pre-allocation model is established. Considering the priority of cargo type, the priority of logistics company and the priority of delivery time, a comprehensive priority is proposed. A flight plan pre-allocation algorithm based on the comprehensive priority is designed. Using campus distribution as a simulation environment for verification, the model and algorithm can generate conflict-free flight schedules and realize pre-differentiated flight plan allocation. The experimental results show that the cost of each flight plan is reduced by 21.69% and 26.58% respectively compared with the task priority allocation and the first come first service allocation. When the comprehensive priority weight combination is 0.2, 0.4, and 0.4, the lowest cost of each flight plan is 5.42 yuan, and the allocation result is the best. © 2023 Chinese Institute of Electronics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2802 / 2811
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] BENLICU, Heuristic search for allocation of slots at network level[J], Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 86, 1, pp. 488-509, (2018)
  • [22] ZHONGH, GUANW, ZHANGW Y, Et al., A bi-objective integer programming model for partly-restricted flight departure scheduling[J], PloS One, 13, 5, (2018)
  • [23] ANDROUTSOPOULOSK N, MANOUSAKISE G, MADASM A., Modeling and solving a bi-objective airport slot scheduling problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 284, 1, pp. 135-151, (2020)
  • [24] JORGED, RIBEIRON A, ANTUNESA P., Towards a decision-support tool for airport slot allocation: application to Guarulhos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)[J], Journal of Air Transport Ma-nagement, 93, 2, (2021)
  • [25] FAIRBROTHER J, ZOGRAFOS K G., Optimal scheduling of slots with season segmentation[J], European Journal of Operational Research, 291, 3, pp. 961-982, (2020)
  • [26] ZOGRAFOSK G, JIANGY, A bi-objective efficiency-fairness model for scheduling slots at congested airports, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 102, 5, pp. 336-350, (2019)
  • [27] FAIRBROTHER J, ZOGRAFOS K G, GLAZEBROOK K D., A slot-scheduling mechanism at congested airports that incorporates efficiency, fairness, and airline preferences[J], Transportation Science, 54, 1, pp. 115-138, (2020)
  • [28] PELLEGRINIAP, BOLICBT, CASTELLIL, Et al., SOSTA: an effective model for the simultaneous optimization of airport slot allocation[J], Transportation research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 99C, 5, pp. 34-53, (2017)
  • [29] RIBEIRO N A, JACQUILLAT A, ANTUNES A P, Et al., Improving slot allocation at level 3 airports, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 127, 9, pp. 32-54, (2019)
  • [30] Announcement of the state post bureau on the 2021 express service satisfaction survey and time-limi- ted on-time rate test results