FLUIDIC INJECTION ANGLE IMPACT ON THRUST VECTORING USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar V. [1 ]
Rohit [2 ]
Shukla H. [1 ]
Gaurav K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun
关键词
Aero jet engine shock vector control; CD nozzle; Fluidic injection angle; Nozzle pressure ratio; Pitch thrust vector; Secondary pressure ratio;
D O I
10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2021037918
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As shock vectoring evolved as a major option of thrust vector control in applications such as jet engine exhaust systems, the computational study (with the validation of experimental data) of injecting the secondary flow into the divergent section of convergent-divergent nozzle has become an attractive option to investigate its optimum performance by increasing the number of secondary injection ports with variation in injection angles. This has led us toward the use of multiple injection ports with varying injection angles for the current study. To perform the simulation of internal flow in the nozzle, a finite volume-based implicit computational fluid dynamics solver was used. The study aims to see the response of the injection angle on the pitch thrust vector using shock vector control. One equation turbulence model of Spalart-Allmaras was used for its precision and robustness, and its need for less computational time. Nozzle performance has been studied at nozzle pressure ratios of 4 and 6. The secondary pressure ratio varies as 0.4, 0.7, and 1. A comparative study of different configurations of multiple injection ports has been done at different injection angles. Shifting of injection slot from nozzle exit to near throat decreases the thrust vectoring capability of the nozzle. The injection angle varies from 60° to 120° concerning the flow direction in the nozzle. Increment in the injection angle has a significant increasing effect on the pitch thrust vector angle. © 2021 Begell House Inc.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 53
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computational Fluid Dynamics of Reaction Injection Moulding
    Mateus, Artur
    Mitchell, Geoffrey
    Bartolo, Paulo
    NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS (ICNAAM 2012), VOLS A AND B, 2012, 1479 : 1584 - 1587
  • [42] Hemodynamic Analysis of a Microanastomosis Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Yagi, Shunjiro
    Sasaki, Takafumi
    Fukuhara, Takahiro
    Fujii, Kaori
    Morita, Maki
    Suyama, Yoshiko
    Fukuoka, Kohei
    Nishino, Teruyasu
    Hisatome, Ichiro
    YONAGO ACTA MEDICA, 2020, 63 (04) : 308 - 312
  • [43] Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Seven Selected Hydrofoils for Different Angle of Attack
    Taslin, Puteri Nurfarah Adawiyah
    Albani, Aliashim
    Ibrahim, Mohd Zamri
    Musa, Mohd Azlan
    Yusop, Zulkifli Mohd
    Jusoh, Mohd Afifi
    JURNAL KEJURUTERAAN, 2021, 4 (01): : 71 - 75
  • [44] Analysis of Fluid Flows in a Stirred Tank Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Kim, Mi Jin
    Lee, Kyung Mi
    Park, Kyun Young
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (03): : 337 - 341
  • [45] Analysis of high injection pressure and ambient temperature on biodiesel spray characteristics using computational fluid dynamics
    Hashim, Akasha
    Khalid, Amir
    Jaat, Norrizam
    Sapit, Azwan
    Razali, Azahari
    Nizam, Akmal
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS IN RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY (CFDRI 2017), 2017, 243
  • [46] Computational Analysis of Chevron-Enhanced Bypass Dual Throat Nozzle for Thrust Vectoring Efficiency
    Periasamy, Karthikeyan
    Ramasamy, Shanmugarajan Ravichandran
    Bogadi, Surendra
    Sinha, Yogesh Kumar
    JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2024, 56 (05): : 967 - 976
  • [47] Optimization of critical angle, distance and flow rate of secondary fuel injection in DI diesel engine using computational fluid dynamics
    Sonachalam, M.
    Manieniyan, V.
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 3 (01):
  • [48] Optimization of critical angle, distance and flow rate of secondary fuel injection in DI diesel engine using computational fluid dynamics
    M. Sonachalam
    V. Manieniyan
    SN Applied Sciences, 2021, 3
  • [49] APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF THRUST VECTOR CONTROL BY FLUID INJECTION
    WU, JM
    CHAPKIS, RL
    MAGER, A
    ARS JOURNAL, 1961, 31 (12): : 1677 - 1685
  • [50] Computational fluid dynamics model for optimal flow injection analysis biosensor design
    Vermeir, S
    Verboven, P
    Atalay, YT
    Nicolaï, BM
    Lammertyn, J
    Irudayaraj, J
    2005 IEEE SENSORS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 365 - 368