Estimates of In-Vehicle Task Element Times for Usability and Distraction Evaluations

被引:1
|
作者
Green P. [1 ]
Koca E. [1 ]
Brennan-Carey C. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Michigan, United States
关键词
D O I
10.4271/2023-01-0789
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Engaging in visual-manual tasks such as selecting a radio station, adjusting the interior temperature, or setting an automation function can be distracting to drivers. Additionally, if setting the automation fails, driver takeover can be delayed. Traditionally, assessing the usability of driver interfaces and determining if they are unacceptably distracting (per the NHTSA driver distraction guidelines and SAE J2364) involves human subject testing, which is expensive and time-consuming. However, most vehicle engineering decisions are based on computational analyses, such as the task time predictions in SAE J2365. Unfortunately, J2365 was developed before touch screens were common in motor vehicles. To update J2365 and other task analyses, estimates were developed for (1) cognitive activities (mental, search, read), (2) low-level 2D elements (Press, Tap, Double Tap, Drag, Zoom, Press and Hold, Rotate, Turn Knob, Type and Keypress, and Flick), (3) complex 2D elements (handwrite, menu use), and (4) for 2D/3D elements (Reach, Swipe, Dwell/Hold, Grab/Grip/Grasp, Release, Draw, Pinch and Spread, and Wave/Shake). A future paper will provide estimates for complex 2D elements and cognitive activities. Most of the time estimates are for young people (ages 18-30) because those data were available. Methods are provided to estimate times for other age groups. These estimates were drawn from recognized data sources including, (1) industrial engineering predetermined time systems (e.g., Methods-Time- Measurement 1 (MTM-1), (2) the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM), (3) the Model Human Processor (MHP), (4) SAE J2365, (5) human-computer interaction studies, and (6) driver-interface studies concerned with estimating and validating task times on touch screens. © 2023 SAE International. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems
    Lansdown, TC
    Brook-Carter, N
    Kersloot, T
    ITS JOURNAL, 2002, 7 (02): : 151 - 168
  • [32] The box task - a method for assessing in-vehicle system demand
    Trommler, Daniel
    Morgenstern, Tina
    Woegerbauer, Elisabeth M.
    Naujoks, Frederik
    Krems, Josef F.
    Keinath, Andreas
    METHODSX, 2021, 8
  • [33] Effects of interface layout on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety
    Li, Rui
    Chen, Yingjie Victor
    Sha, Chunfa
    Lu, Zhangping
    DISPLAYS, 2017, 49 : 124 - 132
  • [34] A Research on the Usability Evaluation of Telecommunication and Navigation Applications in In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems
    Chen, Shih-Chieh
    Tee, Chong De
    2024 21ST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, JCSSE 2024, 2024, : 53 - 60
  • [35] A computer-aided usability testing tool for in-vehicle infotainment systems
    Feng, Fred
    Liu, Yili
    Chen, Yifan
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 109 : 313 - 324
  • [36] CHILDRENS ESTIMATES OF VEHICLE APPROACH TIMES
    HOFFMANN, ER
    PAYNE, A
    PRESCOTT, S
    HUMAN FACTORS, 1980, 22 (02) : 235 - 240
  • [37] Average Task Times in Usability Tests: What to Report?
    Sauro, Jeff
    Lewis, James R.
    CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2010, : 2347 - +
  • [38] Evaluating distraction of in-vehicle information systems while driving by predicting total eyes-off-road times with keystroke level modeling
    Purucker, Christian
    Naujoks, Frederik
    Prill, Andy
    Neukum, Alexandra
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2017, 58 : 543 - 554
  • [39] Detailed analysis of distraction induced by in-vehicle verbal interactions on visual search performance
    Shinohara, Kazumitsu
    Nakamura, Takahiro
    Tatsuta, Seiji
    Iba, Youichi
    IATSS RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [40] On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions
    Ebel, Patrick
    Lingenfelder, Christoph
    Vogelsang, Andreas
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2023, 183