Estimates of In-Vehicle Task Element Times for Usability and Distraction Evaluations

被引:1
|
作者
Green P. [1 ]
Koca E. [1 ]
Brennan-Carey C. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Michigan, United States
关键词
D O I
10.4271/2023-01-0789
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Engaging in visual-manual tasks such as selecting a radio station, adjusting the interior temperature, or setting an automation function can be distracting to drivers. Additionally, if setting the automation fails, driver takeover can be delayed. Traditionally, assessing the usability of driver interfaces and determining if they are unacceptably distracting (per the NHTSA driver distraction guidelines and SAE J2364) involves human subject testing, which is expensive and time-consuming. However, most vehicle engineering decisions are based on computational analyses, such as the task time predictions in SAE J2365. Unfortunately, J2365 was developed before touch screens were common in motor vehicles. To update J2365 and other task analyses, estimates were developed for (1) cognitive activities (mental, search, read), (2) low-level 2D elements (Press, Tap, Double Tap, Drag, Zoom, Press and Hold, Rotate, Turn Knob, Type and Keypress, and Flick), (3) complex 2D elements (handwrite, menu use), and (4) for 2D/3D elements (Reach, Swipe, Dwell/Hold, Grab/Grip/Grasp, Release, Draw, Pinch and Spread, and Wave/Shake). A future paper will provide estimates for complex 2D elements and cognitive activities. Most of the time estimates are for young people (ages 18-30) because those data were available. Methods are provided to estimate times for other age groups. These estimates were drawn from recognized data sources including, (1) industrial engineering predetermined time systems (e.g., Methods-Time- Measurement 1 (MTM-1), (2) the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM), (3) the Model Human Processor (MHP), (4) SAE J2365, (5) human-computer interaction studies, and (6) driver-interface studies concerned with estimating and validating task times on touch screens. © 2023 SAE International. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In-Vehicle Technologies and Driver Distraction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2011, 19 (04) : 29 - 30
  • [2] Distraction intervention strategies of in-vehicle secondary tasks according to the driving task demand
    Ma Y.
    Cao Y.
    Shi H.
    Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48 (09): : 20 - 23and29
  • [3] Aesthetics and usability of in-vehicle navigation displays
    Lavie, Talia
    Oron-Gilad, Tal
    Meyer, Joachim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2011, 69 (1-2) : 80 - 99
  • [4] The prevalence of in-vehicle driver distraction in moving traffic
    Ponte G.
    Edwards S.-A.
    Wundersitz L.
    Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2021, 83 : 33 - 41
  • [5] In-vehicle distraction and fatal accidents in England and Wales
    Stevens, A
    Minton, R
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2001, 33 (04): : 539 - 545
  • [6] Driver Distraction Detection By In-Vehicle Signal Processing
    Im, Seongsu
    Lee, Cheolha
    Yang, Seokyoul
    Kim, Jinhak
    You, Byungyong
    2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN VEHICLES AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (CIVTS), 2014, : 64 - 68
  • [7] Measuring driver distraction - Evaluation of the box task method as a tool for assessing in-vehicle system demand
    Morgenstern, Tina
    Woegerbauer, Elisabeth M.
    Naujoks, Frederik
    Krems, Josef F.
    Keinath, Andreas
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 88 (88)
  • [8] Chinese handwriting while driving: effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction
    Zhong, Qi
    Guo, Gang
    Zhi, Jinyi
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2023, 24 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [9] Dynamic is optimal: Effect of three alternative auto-complete on the usability of in-vehicle dialing displays and driver distraction
    Zhong, Qi
    Zhi, Jinyi
    Guo, Gang
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2022, 23 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [10] In-vehicle Performance and Distraction for Midair and Touch Directional Gestures
    Hafzi, Arman
    Henderson, Jay
    Neshati, Ali
    Zhou, Wei
    Lank, Edward
    Vogel, Daniel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2023), 2023,