Remote sensing estimation of forest above-ground biomass based on spaceborne lidar ICESat-2/ATLAS data

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Hanyue [1 ]
Shu, Qingtai [1 ]
Xi, Lei [1 ]
Qiu, Shuang [1 ]
Wei, Zhiyue [1 ]
Yang, Zezhi [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming,650224, China
关键词
Aneroid altimeters - Biomass - Classification (of information) - Decision trees - Landforms - Landsat - Mean square error - Meteorological instruments - Photons - Radio altimeters - Reflection - Remote sensing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to evaluate the feasibility of the remote sensing estimation using spaceborne Lidar ICESat-2 (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2) data for the forest Aboveground Biomass (AGB) in the mountains region, the Random Forest Regression (RFR) model was conducted by combining the Advanced Terrain Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) photon point cloud data and 54 sample plots in Shangri-La, a typical mountain area in northwest Yunnan, Southwest China. On the basis of the data denoising and classification, the 50 canopy parameters and 3 topographic factors of 74 873 footprints were extracted. A biomass model was established with 53 parameters as the independent variables after the hyper-parametric optimizing RF, and the biomass data was collected from 54 remote sensing plots to serve as dependent variables. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2) and overall estimation accuracy (P1) were used to evaluate the model accuracy. The results showed that: 1) There was the highest significant correlation of the number canopy photons parameters with the forests aboveground biomass (P2=0.90, RMSE=11.90 t/hm2, P1=80.06%, the accuracy indexes of the traditional RF model with the slope were R2=0.91, RMSE=11.01 t/hm2, P1=81.30%. Among them, there was a 13.97% contribution rate of terrain slope factor to the model, which was less than the contribution rate of landsat percentage canopy, apparent surface reflectance and number canopy photons to the model. Thus, there was a certain effect of terrain factor in the traditional model on the remote sensing modeling of ICESat-2/ATLAS footprints. 3) There was a much higher accuracy of the RF regression model after optimization by the hyper-parameters, where the R2=0.93, RMSE=10.13 t/hm2, P1=83.31%. The improved model was much more suitable for the estimation of forest aboveground biomass in mountainous terrain, compared with the traditional. The total and average biomasses of footprints were then estimated as 1.32×105 t, and 77.41 t/hm2 respectively. Furthermore, there was a higher fitting accuracy of the above-ground biomass model for the mountain forest using RF after parameter optimization, where the R2 and estimation accuracy were above 0.9, and 82%, respectively. Consequently, the improved model can be feasible for the AGB inversion using the footprint parameters that were extracted by ICESat-2 in mountainous areas. According to the spatial distribution of biomass of ICESat-2 footprints, the footprints with the high biomass were mainly distributed in the northern part of the study area, and there were uneven distribution and large regional differences, which were consistent with the spatial distribution of volume in the study area in 2021. Therefore, the ICESat-2 can be used for the forest aboveground biomass estimation. The findings can also provide the research cases for the remote sensing monitoring of forest biomass at low-high altitude areas. © 2022 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Urban Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Using GEDI Laser Data and Optical Remote Sensing Images
    Zhao, Xuedi
    Hu, Wenmin
    Han, Jiang
    Wei, Wei
    Xu, Jiaxing
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [22] Above-ground biomass estimation of a secondary forest in Sarawak
    Chai, F.Y.C.
    Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 1997, 9 (03): : 359 - 368
  • [23] Estimation of Forest Above-Ground Biomass in the Study Area of Greater Khingan Ecological Station with Integration of Airborne LiDAR, Landsat 8 OLI, and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data
    Wang, Lu
    Ju, Yilin
    Ji, Yongjie
    Marino, Armando
    Zhang, Wangfei
    Jing, Qian
    FORESTS, 2024, 15 (11):
  • [24] Upscaling coniferous forest above-ground biomass based on airborne LiDAR and satellite ALOS PALSAR data
    Li, Wang
    Niu, Zheng
    Li, Zengyuan
    Wang, Cheng
    Wu, Mingquan
    Muhammad, Shakir
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 10
  • [25] Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient (Kd) from ICESat-2 ATLAS Spaceborne Lidar Using Random-Forest Regression
    Corcoran, Forrest
    Parrish, Christopher E.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 87 (11): : 831 - 840
  • [26] Estimation of Voxel-Based Above-Ground Biomass Using Airborne LiDAR Data in an Intact Tropical Rain Forest, Brunei
    Kim, Eunji
    Lee, Woo-Kyun
    Yoon, Mihae
    Lee, Jong-Yeol
    Son, Yowhan
    Abu Salim, Kamariah
    FORESTS, 2016, 7 (11):
  • [27] Reprint of: Estimation of forest above-ground biomass using multi-parameter remote sensing data over a cold and arid area
    Tian, Xin
    Su, Zhongbo
    Chen, Erxue
    Li, Zengyuan
    van der Tol, Christiaan
    Guo, Jianping
    He, Qisheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2012, 17 : 102 - 110
  • [28] Above-Ground Biomass Estimation in Oats Using UAV Remote Sensing and Machine Learning
    Sharma, Prakriti
    Leigh, Larry
    Chang, Jiyul
    Maimaitijiang, Maitiniyazi
    Caffe, Melanie
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (02)
  • [29] Deep point cloud regression for above-ground forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR
    Oehmcke, Stefan
    Li, Lei
    Trepekli, Katerina
    Revenga, Jaime C.
    Nord-Larsen, Thomas
    Gieseke, Fabian
    Igel, Christian
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 302
  • [30] Estimation of Potato Above-Ground Biomass Based on VGC-AGB Model and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
    Feng Hai-kuan
    Yue Ji-bo
    Fan Yi-guang
    Yang Gui-jun
    Zhao Chun-jiang
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (09) : 2876 - 2884