Prediction of oil flow rate through an orifice flow meter: Artificial intelligence alternatives compared

被引:29
|
作者
Ghorbani H. [1 ]
Wood D.A. [2 ]
Choubineh A. [3 ]
Tatar A. [4 ]
Abarghoyi P.G. [5 ]
Madani M. [3 ]
Mohamadian N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz
[2] DWA Energy Limited, Lincoln
[3] Petroleum Department, Petroleum University of Technology, Ahwaz
[4] Young Researchers and Elite Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
[5] National Iranian South Oil Company (NISOC), Ahvaz
[6] Young Researchers and Elite Club, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh
关键词
Flow-rate prediction error analysis; Flow-rate-predicting virtual meters; Metrics influencing oil flow; Multiple machine-learning algorithm comparisons; Orifice flow meters;
D O I
10.1016/j.petlm.2018.09.003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fluid-flow measurements of petroleum can be performed using a variety of equipment such as orifice meters and wellhead chokes. It is useful to understand the relationship between flow rate through orifice meters (Qv) and the five fluid-flow influencing input variables: pressure (P), temperature (T), viscosity (μ), square root of differential pressure (ΔP^0.5), and oil specific gravity (SG). Here we evaluate these relationships using a range of machine-learning algorithms applied to orifice meter data from a pipeline flowing from the Cheshmeh Khosh Iranian oil field. Correlation coefficients indicate that (Qv) has weak to moderate positive correlations with T, P, and μ, a strong positive correlation with the ΔP^0.5, and a weak negative correlation with oil specific gravity. In order to predict the flow rate with reliable accuracy, five machine-learning algorithms are applied to a dataset of 1037 data records (830 used for algorithm training; 207 used for testing) with the full input variable values for the data set provided. The algorithms evaluated are: Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Gene expression programming (GEP). The prediction performance analysis reveals that all of the applied methods provide predictions at acceptable levels of accuracy. The MLP algorithm achieves the most accurate predictions of orifice meter flow rates for the dataset studied. GEP and RBF also achieve high levels of accuracy. ANFIS and LSSVM perform less well, particularly in the lower flow rate range (i.e., <40,000 stb/day). Some machine learning algorithms have the potential to overcome the limitations of idealized streamline analysis applying the Bernoulli equation when predicting flow rate across an orifice meter, particularly at low flow rates and in turbulent flow conditions. Further studies on additional datasets are required to confirm this. © 2020
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 414
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of Artificial Intelligence to Estimate Oil Flow Rate in Gas-Lift Wells
    Mohammad Rasheed Khan
    Zeeshan Tariq
    Abdulazeez Abdulraheem
    Natural Resources Research, 2020, 29 : 4017 - 4029
  • [22] Application of Artificial Intelligence to Estimate Oil Flow Rate in Gas-Lift Wells
    Khan, Mohammad Rasheed
    Tariq, Zeeshan
    Abdulraheem, Abdulazeez
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (06) : 4017 - 4029
  • [23] Simulation of the flow field of multi-hole orifice flow meter
    Yu, Hongshi
    Zhang, Tao
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Jiang, Wei
    Tianjin Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue yu Gongcheng Jishu Ban)/Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology, 2014, 47 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [24] CLARIFICATION OF MEASUREMENT ERROR OF ORIFICE FLOW METER IN WET STEAM FLOW
    Morita, Ryo
    Umezawa, Shuichi
    Funaki, Tatsuya
    Inada, Fumio
    Sakai, Masayuki
    Ishibashi, Masahiro
    Uchiyama, Yuta
    Amari, Haruo
    Takamoto, Masaki
    Shimada, Hiroyuki
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME POWER CONFERENCE - 2011, VOL 2, 2012, : 307 - +
  • [25] Flow Pattern and Transition Prediction of Gas and Liquid Concurrent Downward Flow through an Orifice
    Qiao M.
    Qiu Z.
    Huang W.
    Zhang Y.
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2021, 42 : 21 - 25
  • [26] A STUDY ON FLOW THROUGH AN ORIFICE WITH PREDICTION OF CAVITATION AND HYDRAULIC FLIP
    Darbandi, Masoud
    Sadeghi, Hamed
    FEDSM2009, VOL 2, 2009, : 381 - 386
  • [27] Flow shape and flow rate of the throttle meter
    不详
    ZEITSCHRIFT DES VEREINES DEUTSCHER INGENIEURE, 1937, 81 : 131 - 132
  • [28] Prediction of Horizontal Oil-Water Flow Pressure Gradient Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Al-Wahaibi, Talal
    Mjalli, Farouq S.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 201 (02) : 209 - 224
  • [29] HYSTERESIS IN FLOW THROUGH AN ORIFICE
    DECKKER, BEL
    NATURE, 1967, 214 (5091) : 904 - &
  • [30] LIQUID FLOW THROUGH AN ORIFICE
    WOLANSKY, EB
    DESIGN NEWS, 1972, 27 (02) : 59 - &