Nuclear policy decision making and deliberative democracy a comparative analysis of deliberative poll in Japan and Korea

被引:0
|
作者
Matsui R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Business Administration, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo
关键词
Accountability; Decision making; Deliberative democracy; Deliberative poll; Nuclear power plant; Policy; Public; Social responsibility; Stakeholder;
D O I
10.3327/taesj.J19.014
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A deliberative poll(DP)is a new type of democratic process in which citizens selected at random from the voters are educated on and discuss given political issues, and then the results are reflected in policy. An example of this occured in 2012 when the Japanese government conducted a DP on nuclear power generation goals for 2030. As a result, support for abolishing nuclear power increased significantly. On the other hand, in 2017, the Korean government conducted a DP on the construction of the Shin-Gori nuclear reactors and on future nuclear policy. As a result, support for the continued construction of the reactors and phase out of nuclear power was strengthened. In Japan's DP compared with that of Korea's, Japan's selected citizens were far less representative of the population, stakeholder's involvement was nonexistent, and the government was much less committed. © 2020 Atomic Energy Society of Japan, All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
    Reedy, Justin
    Orr, Raymond
    Spicer, Paul
    Blanchard, Jessica W.
    Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
    Ketchum, Terry S.
    Saunkeah, Bobby
    Wark, Kyle
    Woodbury, R. Brian
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [42] Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices
    Justin Reedy
    Raymond Orr
    Paul Spicer
    Jessica W. Blanchard
    Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka
    Terry S. Ketchum
    Bobby Saunkeah
    Kyle Wark
    R. Brian Woodbury
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7
  • [43] Think tank 2.0 for deliberative policy analysis
    Li, Ya
    POLICY SCIENCES, 2015, 48 (01) : 25 - 50
  • [44] Analysis and democracy: the antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation
    Lo, Alex Y.
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2011, 29 (06): : 958 - 974
  • [45] Habermas and Foucault: Deliberative Democracy and Strategic State Analysis
    Thomas Biebricher
    Contemporary Political Theory, 2007, 6 (2) : 218 - 245
  • [46] Scripting Deliberative Policy-Making: Dramaturgic Policy Analysis and Engagement Know-How
    Escobar, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2015, 17 (03): : 269 - 285
  • [47] Connecting deliberative mini-publics to representative decision making
    Setala, Maija
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 56 (04) : 846 - 863
  • [48] Democracy 2.0? An analysis of the deliberative potential of political blogging
    Ignacio Criado, J.
    Garcia Alonso, Roberto
    REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS POLITICOS, 2012, (155): : 71 - 99
  • [49] What are Citizens Saying? Analysis of Deliberative Democracy Forums
    Larkin, Dudley
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (5TH), VOL II, 2009, : 507 - 515
  • [50] Think tank 2.0 for deliberative policy analysis
    Ya Li
    Policy Sciences, 2015, 48 : 25 - 50