Evaluation and Screening of Dioxin Control Technology in Waste Incineration Flue Gas

被引:1
|
作者
Zhao S.-L. [1 ,2 ]
Xi P.-F. [3 ]
Guo F.-Y. [2 ]
Deng S. [2 ]
Jia J.-L. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing
[2] Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing
[3] Chongqing Purple Light Chemical Co., Chongqing
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2020年 / 41卷 / 09期
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Dioxins; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Technology evaluation; Waste incineration;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202002170
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To determine the best control technology for dioxin in waste incineration flue gas, a three-level comprehensive evaluation index system with environment, economy, and technology as the first-level indexes was constructed. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were used to evaluate ten dioxin pollution control technologies or technology groups including "double bag activated carbon adsorption technology," "sulfur and sulfide inhibition technology," and "sulfur and sulfide inhibition technology+activated carbon fixed bed reactor technology". The "sulfur and sulfur compound inhibition technology+activated carbon fixed bed technology" scored the highest, and thus is currently the best control technology for dioxin pollution in waste incineration exhaust gas. This technology is suitable for small rural waste incinerators to ensure that dioxin emissions meet the standards. Depending on the local economic development level, enterprise scale, furnace profile, and technological process, waste incineration enterprises in various regions of China can adopt this index evaluation system and method to evaluate the dioxin control technologies and select the best one suitable for the enterprise so that dioxin emissions in the waste incineration flue gas can be effectively controlled. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3985 / 3992
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Ruokojarvi P H, Asikainen A H, Tuppurainen K A, Et al., Chemical inhibition of PCDD/F formation in incineration processes, Science of the Total Environment, 325, 1-3, pp. 83-94, (2004)
  • [22] Pandelova M, Lenoir D, Schramm K W., Inhibition of PCDD/F and PCB formation in co-combustion, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149, 3, pp. 615-618, (2007)
  • [23] Lei M., Emission characteristics and control of PCDD/Fs and heavy metals from small-scale thermal treatment furnace for disposing rural domestic solid waste, (2017)
  • [24] Chen S X, Li X B., Research progress on dioxin control solution in waste incineration power plants, Environmental Science and Management, 37, 5, pp. 89-93, (2012)
  • [25] Zhang G., Study on PCDD/F and heavy metal emission characteristics and control technology during municipal solid waste incineration, (2013)
  • [26] Sun H., Control solution and formation mechanism of dioxin in MSW incineration, Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 14, 2, pp. 12-14, (2006)
  • [27] Pan X J, Yang G H, Huang S, Et al., Advance on dioxins control methods in waste incineration plant, Environmental Science & Technology, 35, 7, pp. 122-125, (2012)
  • [28] (2005)
  • [29] Hung P C, Chang S H, Chi K H, Et al., Degradation of gaseous dioxin-like compounds with dielectric barrier discharges, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, 1-3, pp. 246-251, (2010)
  • [30] Samaras P, Blumenstock M, Lenoir D, Et al., PCDD/F inhibition by prior addition of urea to the solid fuel in laboratory experiments and results statistical evaluation, Chemosphere, 42, 5-7, pp. 737-743, (2001)