Evaluation and Screening of Dioxin Control Technology in Waste Incineration Flue Gas

被引：1

作者：

Zhao S.-L. ^{[1
,2
]}

Xi P.-F. ^{[3
]}

Guo F.-Y. ^{[2
]}

Deng S. ^{[2
]}

Jia J.-L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing

[2] Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing

[3] Chongqing Purple Light Chemical Co., Chongqing

来源：

Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2020年 / 41卷 / 09期

关键词：

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Dioxins; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Technology evaluation; Waste incineration;

D O I：

10.13227/j.hjkx.202002170

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

To determine the best control technology for dioxin in waste incineration flue gas, a three-level comprehensive evaluation index system with environment, economy, and technology as the first-level indexes was constructed. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were used to evaluate ten dioxin pollution control technologies or technology groups including "double bag activated carbon adsorption technology," "sulfur and sulfide inhibition technology," and "sulfur and sulfide inhibition technology+activated carbon fixed bed reactor technology". The "sulfur and sulfur compound inhibition technology+activated carbon fixed bed technology" scored the highest, and thus is currently the best control technology for dioxin pollution in waste incineration exhaust gas. This technology is suitable for small rural waste incinerators to ensure that dioxin emissions meet the standards. Depending on the local economic development level, enterprise scale, furnace profile, and technological process, waste incineration enterprises in various regions of China can adopt this index evaluation system and method to evaluate the dioxin control technologies and select the best one suitable for the enterprise so that dioxin emissions in the waste incineration flue gas can be effectively controlled. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.

引用

页码：3985 / 3992

页数：7

共 34 条

[1] China statistical yearbook 2018, (2019)
[2] Wang P, Hu Y N, Cheng H F., Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration fly ash as an important source of heavy metal pollution in China, Environmental Pollution, 252, pp. 461-475, (2019)
[3] Qi L, Ren Y, Liu A M, Et al., Pollution characteristics of PCDD/Fs in ambient air and exposure risk assessment around a municipal solid waste incinerator in Beijing, Environmental Science, 38, 4, pp. 1317-1326, (2017)
[4] Tuomisto J., Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds: toxicity in humans and animals, sources, and behaviour in the environment, WikiJournal of Medicine, 6, 1, (2019)
[5] GB 18485-2001, Standard for pollution control on the municipal solid waste incineration
[6] Wang S X, Hao J M, Lu Y Q, Et al., Comprehensive fuzzy evaluation of flue gas desulfurization technologies for thermal power plant, Electric Power, 34, 12, pp. 58-62, (2001)
[7] Yu C, Wang S X, Hao J M., Comprehensive fuzzy evaluation of nitrogen oxide control technologies for coal-fired power plants, Environmental Science, 31, 7, pp. 1464-1469, (2010)
[8] Li N., Research on the comprehensive evaluation of the ultra low emission reconstruction project of thermal power plant, (2017)
[9] Deng S, Sun X W, Shu Y, Et al., Comprehensive assessment of primary PM<sub>2.5</sub> control technologies for coal-fired power plants, China Environmental Science, 38, 3, pp. 1157-1164, (2018)
[10] Ren Y J, Zhang Z, He J D, Et al., Comprehensive evaluation and countermeasures of atmospheric mercury pollution control technology in coal-fired power plants, Research of Environmental Sciences, 33, 4, pp. 841-848, (2020)

← 1 2 3 4 →