Classroom Teaching Decision-Making Optimization for Students’ Personalized Learning Needs

被引:0
|
作者
Li L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics and Trade, Shijiazhuang University of Applied Technology, Shijiazhuang
关键词
classroom teaching decision-making; learning needs; multi-objective decision-making optimization; students’ personalized learning;
D O I
10.3991/ijet.v18i09.40233
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Classroom teaching is the basic form of teaching in colleges and universities. Teachers need to constantly optimize classroom teaching decision-making to adapt to the ever-changing educational environment. In order to improve the quality of teaching, stimulate students’ potential, and promote students’ all-round development, it is necessary to fully consider the personalized needs of students in classroom teaching and provide more suitable teaching content and methods for them. To this end, this article takes the accounting major in higher vocational colleges as an example, and conducts a study on the optimization of classroom teaching decision-making for students’ personalized learning needs. It introduces the psychological curve function based on expected performance and current performance to measure the satisfaction degree of students’ personalized learning needs, and as an evaluation of whether students’ personalized learning needs meet expectations, elaborates on the calculation method of expected performance and current performance of personalized learning. A multiobjective decision-making model for classroom teaching is constructed to achieve the three optimization objectives of maximizing the quality of classroom teaching, maximizing the attention of students’ personalized learning needs, and maximizing students’ dissatisfaction, and the solution method of the model is given. Experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and the constructed model © 2023, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning.All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 116
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TEACHING DECISION-MAKING TO MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES BY COMPUTER-ASSISTED-LEARNING
    MURRAY, TS
    CUPPLES, RW
    BARBER, JH
    DUNN, WR
    SCOTT, DB
    HANNAY, DR
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1977, 11 (04) : 262 - 264
  • [32] Decision-Making for Interactive Systems: A Case Study for Teaching and Learning in Bioinformatics
    Machado, Vanessa Stangherlin
    Paixao-Cortes, Walter Ritzel
    de Souza, Osmar Norberto
    Campos, Marcia de Borba
    LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES: TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, LCT 2017, PT II, 2017, 10296 : 90 - 109
  • [33] Anarchist, Neoliberal, & Democratic Decision-Making: Deepening the Joy in Learning and Teaching
    Briscoe, Felecia M.
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES-AESA, 2012, 48 (01): : 76 - 102
  • [34] The effects of learning the decision-making strategy in vocational decision-making in undergraduates
    Shimomura, H
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 46 (02): : 193 - 202
  • [35] Strategies for teaching clinical decision-making
    Boney, J
    Baker, JD
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 1997, 17 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [36] A MODULE FOR TEACHING SCIENTIFIC DECISION-MAKING
    AIKENHEAD, GS
    BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 1987, 7 (1-2) : 137 - 145
  • [37] TEACHING DECISION-MAKING IN GEOSCIENCE COURSES
    REGER, JP
    JOURNAL OF GEOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 1983, 31 (04) : 304 - 306
  • [38] Effectiveness of virtual patients in teaching clinical decision-making skills to dental students
    Mardani, Maryam
    Cheraghian, Sajjad
    Naeeni, Soheyl Khaje
    Zarifsanaiey, Nahid
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2020, 84 (05) : 615 - 623
  • [39] Teaching Inferential Statistics to Social Work Students: A Decision-making Flow Chart
    Calderwood, Kimberly
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN SOCIAL WORK, 2012, 32 (02) : 133 - 147
  • [40] A Serious Game for Teaching Nursing Students Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making Skills
    Johnsen, Hege Mari
    Fossum, Mariann
    Vivekananda-Schmidt, Pirashanthie
    Fruhling, Ann
    Slettebo, Ashild
    NURSING INFORMATICS 2016: EHEALTH FOR ALL: EVERY LEVEL COLLABORATION - FROM PROJECT TO REALIZATION, 2016, 225 : 905 - 906