Response prediction and excitation optimization of flight flutter tests based on a LPV model

被引:0
|
作者
Kou B. [1 ]
Lei M. [1 ]
Lu X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aircraft Flight Test Technology Institute, Chinese Flight Test Establishment, Xi'an
来源
关键词
Excitation optimization; Flight flutter test; Response prediction; State-space model interpolation;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.02.013
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For satisfying the requirements of real-time monitoring and flight test efficiency in flight flutter tests, a local linear dynamic-pressure-varying model was established based on the frequency domain subspace identification method with pole constraint and the state-space interpolation algorithm. The process of velocity extension in the flight flutter tests combined with model iteration was designed, and the structural response prediction and excitation optimization using flight test data were realized. The accuracy of predicted responses and the effectiveness of excitation optimization were verified by simulation examples and actual flight test data. The results show that the accuracy of the predicted responses is gradually improved along with the accumulation of flight test data, and the prediction values can meet the needs of engineering real-time monitoring, compared with the actual flight test responses. The optimized excitation can improve the signal-to-noise ratio of responses and avoid the over-limit of responses, which can improve the efficiency of flight flutter tests. © 2022, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] DESFORGES M J, COOPER J E., Improved flight flutter testing excitation techniques: F61775-98-WE012, (1998)
  • [12] DE CAIGNY J, PINTELON R, CAMINO J F, Et al., Interpolated modeling of LPV systems, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 22, 6, pp. 2232-2246, (2014)
  • [13] MCKELVEY T, AKCAY H, LJUNG L., Subspace-based multivariable system identification from frequency response data, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 7, pp. 960-960, (1996)
  • [14] MCKELVEY T., Subspace methods for frequency domain data, Proceeding of the 2004 American Control Conference, (2004)
  • [15] TANG W., Frequency domain MIMO identification for modeling of structural dynamics-science direct, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 44, 1, pp. 4392-4397, (2011)
  • [16] VAN DER AUWERAER H, GUILLAUME P, VERBOVEN P, Et al., Application of a fast-stabilizing frequency domain parameter estimation method, Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement & Control, 123, 4, pp. 651-658, (2001)
  • [17] GUILLAUME P, VERBOVEN P, VANLANDUIT S, Et al., A poly-reference implementation of the least-squares complex frequency-domain estimator, Proceedings of IMAC 21, (2003)
  • [18] SUN Xinhui, HAO Muming, WANG Huaiwei, Fast implementation for PolyMAX modal identification algorithm, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 30, 10, pp. 13-15, (2011)
  • [19] KO J, KURDILA A J, STRGANAC T W., Nonlinear control of a prototypical wing section with torsional nonlinearity, Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 20, 6, pp. 1181-1189, (1997)
  • [20] SILVA W A, STRGANAC T W, HAJJ M R., Higher-order spectral analysis of a nonlinear pitch and plunge apparatus, 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials, (2005)