Stress and deformation analysis of geosynthetic-encased stone columns based on symplectic system

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang L. [1 ]
Zhang X.-B. [1 ]
Xu Z.-Y. [1 ]
Ou Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha
关键词
Geosynthetic-encased stone column; Optimal encasement depth; Space axisymmetry; Symplectic dual equation; Symplectic system; Variable separation;
D O I
10.11779/CJGE202011009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the hoop effect of geogrids, the stress and deformation mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) is more complex than that of the ordinary stone columns. In this study, the stress and deformation of a single GESC is regarded as a space axisymmetric problem. Based on the symplectic system theory, a symplectic dual equation considering the shear stress of the cross section of the column is formulated, the variables of the equation are separated, and the distribution functions for the settlement and radial deformation of GESCs are finally obtained according to the boundary conditions. The rationality and feasibility of this method are verified by the practical example, and the parameter analysis shows that the settlement and bulging of GESCs decrease with the increase of encasement stiffness. They increase with the increase of pile-soil stress ratio, but the growth rate decreases gradually. They decrease with the increase of encasement depth, but no longer change when they exceed the optimal encasement depth. The optimal encasement depth increases with the increase of load and pile spacing, and with the decrease of lateral pressure coefficient. © 2020, Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2040 / 2049
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] XU Zhi-lun, Elastic Mechanics (I), (2006)
  • [12] ZHANG W X, CUI W H, XAIO Z R, Et al., The quasi-static analysis for the viscoelastic hollow circular cylinder using the symplectic system method, International Journal of Engineering Science, 48, pp. 727-741, (2010)
  • [13] XU Zhi-ying, Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics (First volume), pp. 87-88, (1973)
  • [14] MALARVIZHI, ILAMPARUTHI, Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column, Soils and Foundations, 47, 5, pp. 873-885, (2007)
  • [15] YOO C, LEE D., Performance of geogrid-encased stone columns in soft ground: Full-scale load tests, Geosynthetics International, 19, 6, pp. 480-490, (2012)
  • [16] GONG Xiao-nan, Composite Foundation Design and Construction Guideline, pp. 109-110, (2003)
  • [17] WU C S, HONG Y S., The behavior of a laminated reinforced granular column, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26, 4, pp. 302-316, (2008)
  • [18] ZHAO Ming-hua, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, (2014)
  • [19] ZHANG L, ZHAO M, SHI C, Et al., Settlement calculation of composite foundation reinforced with stone columns, International Journal of Geomechanics, 13, 3, pp. 248-256, (2012)
  • [20] Geological Engineering Handbook, pp. 176-177, (2018)