Stress and deformation analysis of geosynthetic-encased stone columns based on symplectic system

被引：0
|
作者：
Zhang L. [1 ]
Zhang X.-B. [1 ]
Xu Z.-Y. [1 ]
Ou Q. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha
来源：
Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering | 2020年 / 42卷 / 11期
关键词：
Geosynthetic-encased stone column; Optimal encasement depth; Space axisymmetry; Symplectic dual equation; Symplectic system; Variable separation;
D O I：
10.11779/CJGE202011009
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Due to the hoop effect of geogrids, the stress and deformation mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) is more complex than that of the ordinary stone columns. In this study, the stress and deformation of a single GESC is regarded as a space axisymmetric problem. Based on the symplectic system theory, a symplectic dual equation considering the shear stress of the cross section of the column is formulated, the variables of the equation are separated, and the distribution functions for the settlement and radial deformation of GESCs are finally obtained according to the boundary conditions. The rationality and feasibility of this method are verified by the practical example, and the parameter analysis shows that the settlement and bulging of GESCs decrease with the increase of encasement stiffness. They increase with the increase of pile-soil stress ratio, but the growth rate decreases gradually. They decrease with the increase of encasement depth, but no longer change when they exceed the optimal encasement depth. The optimal encasement depth increases with the increase of load and pile spacing, and with the decrease of lateral pressure coefficient. © 2020, Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2040 / 2049
页数：9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] VAN IMPE W F., Soil improvement techniques and their evolution, Animal Science Papers. Sd Reports
  • [2] ZHAO Ming-hua, HE Wei-xi, HENG Shuai, Et al., Calculation method of geogrid-encased stone columns' bearing capacity based on cavity expansion theory, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 39, 10, pp. 1785-1792, (2017)
  • [3] RAITHEL M, KEMPFERT H G., Calculation models for dam foundations with geosynthetic coated sand columns, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, (2000)
  • [4] DUAN Y Y, ZHANG Y P, CHAN D, Et al., Theoretical elastoplastic analysis for foundations with geosynthetic-encased columns, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, 13, 7, pp. 506-518, (2012)
  • [5] ZHANG L, ZHAO M., Deformation analysis of geotextile-encased stone columns, International Journal of Geomechanics, 15, 3, pp. 1-10, (2015)
  • [6] KONG G Q, ZHOU Y, LIU H L., Nonlinear model analysis of radial bulging deformation of geosynthetic-encased stone columns, International Journal of Geomechanics, 18, 10, pp. 1-12, (2018)
  • [7] PULKO B, MAJES B, LOGAR J., Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29, 1, pp. 29-39, (2011)
  • [8] ZHOU Y, KONG G Q., Deformation analysis of a geosynthetic-encased stone column and surrounding soil using cavity-expansion model, International Journal of Geomechanics, 19, 5, pp. 1-12, (2019)
  • [9] ZHAO Ming-hua, NIU Hao-yi, LIU Meng, Et al., Pile-soil stress ratio and settlement of composite ground with gravel piles in flexible foundation, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 39, 9, pp. 1549-1556, (2017)
  • [10] ZHONG Wan-xie, A New Systematic Methodology for Theory of Elasticity, (1995)
12