Large-Scale Topology Optimization for Unsteady Flow Using the Building-Cube Method

被引:0
|
作者
Katsumata R. [1 ]
Nishiguchi K. [1 ]
Shimada T. [2 ]
Hoshiba H. [1 ]
Kato J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya University, Japan
[2] Kobe University, Japan
关键词
Building-cube method; Finite volume method; Topology optimization; Unsteady flow;
D O I
10.11421/jsces.2023.20230007
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, topology optimization methods have been applied not only to structural problems but also to fluid flow problems. Most of the previous studies assume steady-state flow. In contrast, this paper focuses on topology optimization for unsteady flow, which is more general from an engineering point of view. However, unsteady flow topology optimization involves solving the governing and adjoint equations of a time-evolving system, which requires a huge computational cost for topology optimization with a fine mesh. Therefore, we propose a large-scale unsteady flow topology optimization based on the building-cube method (BCM), which is suitable for massively parallel computing. BCM is one of the hierarchical Cartesian mesh methods and is confirmed to have very good scalability. The governing equations are discretized by a cell-centered finite volume method based on the BCM. The objective sensitivity is obtained by the continuous adjoint method. Several numerical examples are demonstrated to discuss its applicability to large-scale computations. © 2023 by the Japan Society for Computational Engineering and Science.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Eulerian elastoplastic simulation of vehicle structures by building-cube method on supercomputer Fugaku
    Nishiguchi, Koji
    Takeuchi, Shusuke
    Sugiyama, Hirofumi
    Okazawa, Shigenobu
    Katsuhara, Tadasuke
    Yonehara, Keiichi
    Kojima, Shigeki
    Kawahara, Kosho
    Hoshiba, Hiroya
    Kato, Junji
    THE PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION, HPC ASIA 2024, 2024, : 145 - 153
  • [42] Optimal Flow Control and Topology Optimization Using the Continuous Adjoint Method in Unsteady Flows
    Kavvadias, Ioannis S.
    Karpouzas, George K.
    Papoutsis-Kiachagias, Evangelos M.
    Papadimitriou, Dimitris I.
    Giannakoglou, Kyriakos C.
    ADVANCES IN EVOLUTIONARY AND DETERMINISTIC METHODS FOR DESIGN, OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL IN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES, 2015, 36 : 159 - 173
  • [43] Design optimization and active control of unsteady flow in large-scale annular linear induction pumps
    Wang, Dayong
    Wang, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Wenxuan
    Zhao, Ruijie
    AIP ADVANCES, 2024, 14 (12)
  • [44] BOXSTEP METHOD FOR LARGE-SCALE OPTIMIZATION
    MARSTEN, RE
    HOGAN, WW
    BLANKENSHIP, JW
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1975, 23 (03) : 389 - 405
  • [45] Topology optimization of large scale stokes flow problems
    Niels Aage
    Thomas H. Poulsen
    Allan Gersborg-Hansen
    Ole Sigmund
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2008, 35 : 175 - 180
  • [46] Topology optimization of large scale stokes flow problems
    Aage, Niels
    Poulsen, Thomas H.
    Gersborg-Hansen, Allan
    Sigmund, Ole
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 35 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [47] Large-scale sandwich structures optimization using Bayesian method
    Liu, Hongwei
    Guo, Jiaming
    Wang, Jinliang
    Wang, Changguo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 272
  • [48] Vortex interaction in an unsteady large-scale shear/strain flow
    Perrot, Xavier
    Carton, Xavier
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON HAMILTONIAN DYNAMICS, VORTEX STRUCTURES, TURBULENCE, 2008, 6 : 373 - 381
  • [49] Computational simulations and optimization of flow and temperature distributions in a large-scale power plant building
    Lee, T. -W.
    Singh, Hardeep
    Lee, Junyoung
    Jeong, Hyo-Min
    Sturm, Douglas
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2011, 4 (04) : 341 - 349
  • [50] Computational simulations and optimization of flow and temperature distributions in a large-scale power plant building
    T. -W. Lee
    Hardeep Singh
    Junyoung Lee
    Hyo-Min Jeong
    Douglas Sturm
    Building Simulation, 2011, 4 : 341 - 349