Unmanned aerial vehicle implementation for pavement condition survey

被引:0
|
作者
Astor Y. [1 ]
Nabesima Y. [2 ]
Utami R. [1 ]
Sihombing A.V.R. [1 ]
Adli M. [1 ]
Firdaus M.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Jl. Gegerkalong Hilir Ds Ciwaruga, Bandung Barat
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Akashi College, Akashi
来源
关键词
Pavement distress; PCI; SDI; UAV;
D O I
10.1016/j.treng.2023.100168
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) as a vehicle for comprehensive and fast road condition data acquisition is expected to minimize or even replace conventional road condition surveys in the field. In addition, the final UAV product in the form of a 2D/3D model of road conditions has been proven to be used as a medium for interpreting road damage and measuring the dimensions of road damage without having to do it in the field. The significant difference between this study and other studies is found in the use of the Surface Distress Index and Pavement Condition Index methods for assessing road conditions on the 2D/3D model of the UAV results. No research compares the use of the two methods in 2D/3D models. This research took photos of pavement conditions using drones to produce 2D and 3D models as visual media for assessing pavement conditions using the Pavement Condition Index and Surface Distress Index methods. The results of the assessment on the model compared with the assessment in the field. In comparison, the dimension level of accuracy of pavement distress in the model against the results of manual measurements in the field, edge cracking has the lowest accuracy value of 75.72%, and joint reflective crack has the highest accuracy value of 97.86%. The linear regression equation for the Pavement Condition Index method in the model against manual in the field is y = 0.931x + 3.6003 with a coefficient of determination r2 = 0.86 and an MSE of 121.333, while the linear regression equation for the Surface Distress Index method in the model against manual in the field is y = 0.5831x + 28.867 with a coefficient of determination that is r2 = 0.653 and MSE = 2115. Based on the comparison above, in this study, the application of UAV for pavement condition assessment is more precise using the Pavement Condition Index method. © 2023 The Author(s)
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survey on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Communications for 6G
    Chen Xinying
    Sheng Min
    Li Bo
    Zhao Nan
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 44 (03) : 781 - 789
  • [22] Evolutionary computation for unmanned aerial vehicle path planning: a survey
    Jiang, Yi
    Xu, Xin-Xin
    Zheng, Min-Yi
    Zhan, Zhi-Hui
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2024, 57 (10)
  • [23] Network simulation tools for unmanned aerial vehicle communications: A survey
    Jiang, Weiwei
    Han, Haoyu
    He, Miao
    Gu, Weixi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 37 (15)
  • [24] A Literature Survey of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Usage for Civil Applications
    Sivakumar, Mithra
    Malleswari, Naga T. Y. J.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 13
  • [25] Survey of Advances in Control Algorithms of Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
    Li, Lebao
    Sun, Lingling
    Jin, Jie
    2015 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCT), 2015, : 107 - 111
  • [26] A Survey on the Jamming and Spoofing attacks on the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks
    Alrefaei, Faisal
    Alzahrani, Abdullah
    Song, Houbing
    Alrefaei, Salma
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL IOT, ELECTRONICS AND MECHATRONICS CONFERENCE (IEMTRONICS), 2022, : 981 - 987
  • [27] Employing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Monitor the Health Condition of Wind Turbines
    Huang, Yishuo
    Chiang, Chih-Hung
    Hsu, Keng-Tsang
    Cheng, Chia-Chi
    44TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOL 37, 2018, 1949
  • [28] Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Following A SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS FOR FIXED-WING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
    Sujit, P. B.
    Saripalli, Srikanth
    Sousa, Joao Borges
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2014, 34 (01): : 42 - 59
  • [29] Unmanned aerial vehicle-based computer vision for structural vibration measurement and condition assessment: A concise survey
    Zhou K.
    Wang Z.
    Ni Y.-Q.
    Zhang Y.
    Tang J.
    Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 2023, 2 (02):
  • [30] Design and implementation of an unmanned aerial vehicle with self-propulsive wing
    Kasem, Abdelrahman
    Gamal, Ahmad
    Hany, Amr
    Gaballa, Hesham
    Ahmed, Karim
    Romany, Mina
    Abdelkawy, Mohamed
    Abdelrahman, Mohamed M.
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (06)