Artificial Intelligence Use in Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Pang, Toh Yen [1 ]
Kootsookos, Alex [1 ]
Cheng, Chi-Tsun [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
STUDENTS; BELIEFS; TEXT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Feedback, particularly the formative or 'feed- forward' type is important for students in higher education to understand their errors and improve their expression and clarity of ideas. While technology-assisted feedback modes, e.g., audio or video are prevalent, ensuring their efficacy and succinctness, particularly for non-English-speaking background (NESB) educators can be challenging. This study investigates the attitudes and experiences of NESB educators in the School of Engineering of RMIT University, with a focus on their use of AI-assisted tools for providing feedback to students in higher education settings. Utilising a survey, the researchers examined how personal and linguistic attributes influenced feedback strategies and explored the educators' perspectives on integrating AI tools, such as ChatGPT and BARD, in their teaching practice and to enhance student engagement with the feedback they received. Through thematic analysis the findings reveal that personal background and linguistic proficiency significantly influenced the provision of feedback. Furthermore, even though educators had different levels of familiarity with AI-assisted tools, there was a general consensus on the potential utility of these tools for improving feedback provision. These will require targeted staff training, careful human oversight to ensure quality and avoid training to align feedback with individual teaching styles.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 25
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Should ChatGPT help with my research? A caution against artificial intelligence in qualitative analysis
    Friedman, Carli
    Owen, Aleksa
    Vanpuymbrouck, Laura
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [42] Artificial intelligence as a feedback provider in practicing public speaking
    Isotalus, Pekka
    Eklund, Marja
    Karppinen, Karoliina
    COMMUNICATION TEACHER, 2025, 39 (01) : 78 - 85
  • [43] The medical profession transformed by artificial intelligence: Qualitative study
    Mosch, Lina
    Fuerstenau, Daniel
    Brandt, Jenny
    Wagnitz, Jasper
    Al Klopfenstein, Sophie
    Poncette, Akira-Sebastian
    Balzer, Felix
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [44] Artificial intelligence and corporate carbon neutrality: A qualitative exploration
    Luqman, Adeel
    Zhang, Qingyu
    Talwar, Shalini
    Bhatia, Meena
    Dhir, Amandeep
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 33 (05) : 3986 - 4003
  • [45] Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: A qualitative exploration of the surgeon perspective
    Kamal, Ahmed Hassan
    Zakaria, Ossama Mohammed
    Majzoub, Rabab Abbas
    Nasir, El Walid Fadul
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (24) : E34071
  • [46] Understanding Organizations? Artificial Intelligence Journey: A Qualitative Approach
    Radhakrishnan, Jayanthi
    Gupta, Sumeet
    Prashar, Sanjeev
    PACIFIC ASIA JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (06): : 43 - 77
  • [47] Empowering Qualitative Research Methods in Education with Artificial Intelligence
    Longo, Luca
    COMPUTER SUPPORTED QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: NEW TRENDS ON QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (WCQR2019), 2020, 1068 : 1 - 21
  • [48] Fuzzy quantification method of qualitative concept in artificial intelligence
    Yin, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 2059 - 2062
  • [49] THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE METHODS IN THE ANALYSIS OF SERIAL KILLERS' PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS
    Yasnitsky, Leonid N.
    Vauleva, Svetlana V.
    Safonova, Darya N.
    Cherepanov, Fyodor M.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2015, 9 (03): : 423 - 430
  • [50] Bibliometric and Systematic Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots' Use for Language Education
    Wu, Tiantian
    Yu, Zhonggen
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING AND LEARNING PRACTICE, 2024, 21 (06):