Returning individual research results to participants: Values, preferences, and expectations

被引:0
|
作者
Kent, Denise A. [1 ,2 ]
Villegas-Downs, Michelle [3 ]
Del Rios, Marina [4 ]
Freedman, Michael [2 ]
Krishnan, Jerry A. [2 ,5 ]
Menchaca, Martha G. [6 ]
Patil, Crystal L. [7 ]
Sculley, Jenny [5 ]
Tintle, Nathan [8 ]
Gerald, Lynn B. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Biobehav Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Breathe Chicago Ctr, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care Sleep & Allergy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Human Dev Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Emergency Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Off Populat Hlth Sci, Off Vice Chancellor Hlth Affairs, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth Behav & Biol Sci, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Univ Illinois, Dept Populat Hlth Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Return of individual research results; recruitment; retention; engagement research benefits; trust in research; participant-centered research;
D O I
10.1017/cts.2024.568
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/objective: Disclosing individual research results to participants is not standard practice. The return of individual research results to participants may increase recruitment, retention, and engagement in research. This study's objective was to explore the preferences, expectations, and experiences of research participants receiving individual research results. Methods: A mixed-methods approach, consisting of semi-structured interviews and a health literacy assessment, was used with participants enrolled in a cohort study. The interviews were analyzed to produce an understanding of current experiences. Using descriptive analyses, responses were compared to identify alignments and divergences among participants. Results: Forty-three English-speaking and 16 Spanish-speaking participants enrolled. Ninety-eight percent of participants wanted to receive their individual research results. Seventy-five percent of participants reported they shared results with their healthcare providers. More participants aged 18-65 reported the need to follow up with their provider (70%) as compared to participants > 65 (20%). Two-thirds of participants reported a positive experience receiving their research results; however, 22% reported anxiety and worry. Most participants (69%) described the electronic medical record (EMR) as their preferred method for receiving their results. Yet only 50% of Spanish speakers preferred receiving research results through the EMR compared to 77% of English speakers. Participants with low health literacy preferred receiving study results in person or by phone. Conclusion: Research participants value receiving their individual research results, and this may increase recruitment and retention within the research enterprise. While more research is needed, the lessons learned from this study lay the groundwork for developing best practices and policies around the return of individual research results.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Returning Pleiotropic Results From Genetic Testing to Patients and Research Participants
    Kocarnik, Jonathan M.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (08): : 795 - 796
  • [22] Considerations for Returning Research Results to Culturally Diverse Participants and Families of Decedents
    Garrison, Nanibaa'A.
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2015, 43 (03): : 569 - 575
  • [23] Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research
    Wynn, Julia
    Martinez, Josue
    Duong, Jimmy
    Chiuzan, Codruta
    Phelan, Jo C.
    Fyer, Abby
    Klitzman, Robert L.
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (04) : 841 - 851
  • [24] Returning individual research results for genome sequences of pancreatic cancer
    Amber L Johns
    David K Miller
    Skye H Simpson
    Anthony J Gill
    Karin S Kassahn
    Jeremy L Humphris
    Jaswinder S Samra
    Katherine Tucker
    Lesley Andrews
    David K Chang
    Nicola Waddell
    Marina Pajic
    John V Pearson
    Sean M Grimmond
    Andrew V Biankin
    Nikolajs Zeps
    Genome Medicine, 6
  • [25] Returning individual research results for genome sequences of pancreatic cancer
    Johns, Amber L.
    Miller, David K.
    Simpson, Skye H.
    Gill, Anthony J.
    Kassahn, Karin S.
    Humphris, Jeremy L.
    Samra, Jaswinder S.
    Tucker, Katherine
    Andrews, Lesley
    Chang, David K.
    Waddell, Nicola
    Pajic, Marina
    Pearson, John V.
    Grimmond, Sean M.
    Biankin, Andrew V.
    Zeps, Nikolajs
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2014, 6
  • [26] Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry
    Shen, Francis X.
    Baum, Matthew L.
    Martinez-Martin, Nicole
    Miner, Adam S.
    Abraham, Melissa
    Brownstein, Catherine A.
    Cortez, Nathan
    Evans, Barbara J.
    Germine, Laura T.
    Glahn, David C.
    Grady, Christine
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Hurley, Elisa A.
    Kimble, Sara
    Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel
    Leary, Kimberlyn
    Marks, Mason
    Monette, Patrick J.
    Onnela, Jukka-Pekka
    O'Rourke, P. Pearl
    Rauch, Scott L.
    Shachar, Carmel
    Sen, Srijan
    Vahia, Ipsit
    Vassy, Jason L.
    Baker, Justin T.
    Bierer, Barbara E.
    Silverman, Benjamin C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2024, 24 (02): : 69 - 90
  • [27] Decision-making and role preferences for receiving individual pharmacogenomic research results among participants at a Ugandan HIV research institute
    Nabukenya, Sylvia
    Waitt, Catriona
    Twimukye, Adelline
    Mushabe, Brian
    Castelnuovo, Barbara
    Zawedde-Muyanja, Stella
    Muhindo, Richard
    Kyaddondo, David
    Mwaka, Erisa S.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [28] Returning research results to clinical trial participants: A survey of patients with cancer.
    Elzinga, K.
    Fernandez, C. V.
    Heng, D. Y. C.
    Tang, P. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [29] Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants
    Raymond, Megan B.
    Cooper, Kayla E.
    Parker, Lisa S.
    Bonham, Vence L.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2021, 24 (5-6) : 241 - 252
  • [30] Disclosing individual results of clinical research - Implications of respect for participants
    Shalowitz, DI
    Miller, FG
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (06): : 737 - 740