Asymmetric Adaption in Social Learning: Understanding the Dilemma of Competition and Cooperation

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Siying [1 ]
Huang, Yulong [2 ]
Xu, Cheng [3 ]
Wu, Jie [4 ]
Qu, Chen [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] South China Normal Univ, Ctr Studies Psychol Applicat, Sch Psychol, Key Lab Brain Cognit & Educ Sci,Minist Educ,Guangd, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Fuzhou 350117, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
competition; cooperation; chicken game; social learning; social dilemma; NEURAL BASIS; DECISION-MAKING; METAANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; DOMINANCE; PRISONERS; RESPONSES; IDENTITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3390/bs14080721
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The constant challenge in social interactions involves making informed decisions in the face of competitive and cooperative dilemmas. The decision-making process can be influenced by various factors present in the social context. According to the behavior-pattern-categorization framework of information acquisition, potential biases may develop at all stages of decision-making as information about social context is progressively entered and integrated. In this study, employing the Chicken Game, we investigated the influence of varying information levels within the behavior-pattern-categorization framework (i.e., competitiveness of behavior choice, uncertainty of behavior pattern, and sociality of category) on decision-making in the dilemma of competition and cooperation. Combined with reinforcement learning models, our findings from three experiments showed that participants exhibited basic complementary behavior, becoming less competitive against highly competitive opponents and vice versa. Notably, individuals exhibited varying adaptation rates to different levels of opponent competitiveness and fluctuations. Specifically, participants adapted slower to highly competitive opponents and faster to cooperative opponents. This asymmetric adaptation in social learning is related to the rate at which various levels of information are updated. The current study disentangles the different levels of information acquisition and highlights the asymmetric processing that can occur during the updating of information within each level.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Onymity promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments
    Wang, Zhen
    Jusup, Marko
    Wang, Rui-Wu
    Shi, Lei
    Iwasa, Yoh
    Moreno, Yamir
    Kurths, Juergen
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (03):
  • [22] UNDERSTANDING AND COOPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS
    GOETZE, D
    ORBELL, JM
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1988, 57 (03) : 275 - 279
  • [23] Dynamics of Cooperation in a Task Completion Social Dilemma
    Giraldo, Luis Felipe
    Passino, Kevin M.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [24] Facilitating cooperation in a social dilemma: A persuasion approach
    Rosen, J
    Haaga, DAF
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 132 (02): : 143 - 153
  • [25] The effect of individual attitude on cooperation in social dilemma
    Wang, Mengyao
    Pan, Qiuhui
    He, Mingfeng
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 555
  • [26] Understanding Decisions in Collective Risk Social Dilemma Games Using Reinforcement Learning
    Kumar, Medha
    Dutt, Varun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COGNITIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (04) : 824 - 840
  • [27] Learning, competition and cooperation in simple games
    M.A.R. de Cara
    O. Pla
    F. Guinea
    The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 2000, 13 (3): : 413 - 416
  • [28] COMPETITION IMPAIRS LEARNING COOPERATION ENRICHES IT
    不详
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1987, 54 (02): : 80 - &
  • [29] Learning, competition and cooperation in simple games
    de Cara, MAR
    Pla, O
    Guinea, F
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2000, 13 (03): : 413 - 416
  • [30] Cooperation, But Not Competition, Enhances Motor Learning
    Kaefer, Angelica
    Chiviacowsky, Suzete
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 43 : S32 - S33