TURBULENCE GENERATION MECHANISMS IN COMPRESSOR BOUNDARY LAYERS

被引:0
|
作者
Dellacasagrande, M. [1 ]
Przytarski, P. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Mech Energy Management & Transport Engn DIME, I-16145 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Mech Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
TRANSITION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Turbomachinery flows are highly unsteady and feature complex interactions between stationary and rotating blades coupled with high freestream turbulence effects. This unsteadiness can lead to a variety of transition mechanisms. A detailed investigation of turbulence production under various levels of freestream unsteadiness in attached and separated boundary layers may guide the definition of "laminar" and "turbulent" kinetic energies for the development of highly accurate transition models based on laminar kinetic energy concept. For this purpose, high-fidelity scale-resolving simulations of a compressor blade-row exposed to turbulent inflow conditions were studied. The conditions were chosen such that the suction side boundary layer was either predominantly attached or separated. Using a turbulent event recognition technique a local laminar-turbulent discretization of the flow was obtained providing the reference value of the local boundary layer intermittency. Then, the contribution of turbulence production associated with different flow scales was computed for the attached and the separated boundary layers. Comparing the local levels of turbulence production with the local value of the boundary layer intermittency function allowed classifying the individual flow features as "laminar" and "turbulent" depending on their role in transition. It is shown that the fluctuations originating from vortex shedding in separated boundary layers should be classified and included in the turbulent kinetic energy budget. On the other hand, low frequency shear layer fluctuations and streaky structures are seen to mostly contribute to the laminar kinetic energy budget. Data presented in this work is expected to provide insight into the turbulence generation mechanisms in turbomachinery flows and can be adopted for the future construction of physics-based transition models.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TURBULENCE MODELING AND SIMULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYERS
    ABOUARAB, TW
    SERAGELDIN, MA
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (01): : 40 - 44
  • [42] INTERACTION OF DIFFUSION AND TURBULENCE IN RHYTHMIC FORMATION OF BOUNDARY LAYERS
    SCHAAFFS, W
    KOLLOID-ZEITSCHRIFT AND ZEITSCHRIFT FUR POLYMERE, 1968, 227 (1-2): : 131 - &
  • [43] Predicting the Collapse of Turbulence in Stably Stratified Boundary Layers
    B. J. H. van de Wiel
    A. F. Moene
    G. J. Steeneveld
    O. K. Hartogensis
    A. A. M. Holtslag
    Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2007, 79 : 251 - 274
  • [44] Techniques for Turbulence Tripping of Boundary Layers in RANS Simulations
    Narges Tabatabaei
    Ricardo Vinuesa
    Ramis Örlü
    Philipp Schlatter
    Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2022, 108 : 661 - 682
  • [45] The effects of expansion on the turbulence structure of compressible boundary layers
    Arnette, SA
    Samimy, M
    Elliott, GS
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1998, 367 : 67 - 105
  • [46] TURBULENCE MODEL FOR BOUNDARY-LAYERS NEAR WALLS
    NG, KH
    SPALDING, DB
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1972, 15 (01) : 20 - +
  • [47] Turbulence, Radiation and fog in Dutch Stable Boundary Layers
    Peter G. Duynkerke
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1999, 90 : 447 - 477
  • [48] Turbulence intensity similarity laws for turbulent boundary layers
    Marusic, I
    Kunkel, GJ
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON REYNOLDS NUMBER SCALING IN TURBULENT FLOW, 2004, 74 : 17 - 22
  • [49] A Study of Intermittent Turbulence in Stable Arctic Boundary Layers
    Butterworth, Brian J.
    de Boer, Gijs
    Lawrence, Dale
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2024, 190 (01)
  • [50] High freestream turbulence effects on turbulent boundary layers
    Thole, KA
    Bogard, DG
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (02): : 276 - 284