DeepNRMS: Unsupervised deep learning for noise-robust CO2 monitoring in time-lapse seismic images

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Min Jun [1 ]
Frigerio, Julio [1 ]
Clapp, Bob [1 ]
Biondi, Biondo [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
NEURAL-NETWORK; STORAGE SITE; REPEATABILITY; INJECTION; RESERVOIR; PROJECT; ARRAY;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2023-0608.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Monitoring stored CO2 2 in carbon capture and storage projects is crucial for ensuring safety and effectiveness. We introduce DeepNRMS, a novel noise-robust method that effectively handles time-lapse noise in seismic images. The DeepNRMS leverages unsupervised deep learning to acquire knowledge of time-lapse noise characteristics from preinjection surveys. By using this learned knowledge, our approach accurately discerns CO2-induced 2-induced subtle signals from the high-amplitude time-lapse noise, ensuring fidelity in monitoring while reducing costs by enabling sparse acquisition. We evaluate our method using synthetic data and field data acquired in the Aquistore project. In the synthetic experiments, we simulate time-lapse noise by incorporating random near-surface effects in the elastic properties of the subsurface model. We train our neural networks exclusively on preinjection seismic images and subsequently predict CO2 2 locations from postinjection seismic images. In the field data analysis from Aquistore, the images from preinjection surveys are used to train the neural networks with the characteristics of time-lapse noise, followed by identifying CO2 2 plumes within two postinjection surveys. The outcomes demonstrate the improved accuracy achieved by DeepNRMS, effectively addressing the strong time-lapse noise.
引用
收藏
页码:IM1 / IM11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating saturation and density changes caused by CO2 injection at Sleipner - Using time-lapse seismic amplitude-variation-with-offset and time-lapse gravity
    Landro, Martin
    Zumberge, Mark
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2017, 5 (02): : T243 - T257
  • [42] Time-lapse seismic data inversion for estimating reservoir parameters using deep learning
    Kaur, Harpreet
    Zhong, Zhi
    Sun, Alexander
    Fomel, Sergey
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2022, 10 (01): : T167 - T179
  • [43] Time-lapse monitoring of internal erosion in earthen dams and levees using ambient seismic noise
    Planes, T.
    Mooney, M. A.
    Rittgers, J. B. R.
    Parekh, M. L.
    Behm, M.
    Snieder, R.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2016, 66 (04): : 301 - 312
  • [44] Time-lapse pressure tomography for characterizing CO2 plume evolution in a deep saline aquifer
    Hu, Linwei
    Bayer, Peter
    Alt-Epping, Peter
    Tatomir, Alexandru
    Sauter, Martin
    Brauchler, Ralf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 39 : 91 - 106
  • [45] Monitoring gas production and CO2 injection at the Sleipner field using time-lapse gravimetry
    Alnes, Havard
    Eiken, Ola
    Stenvold, Torkjell
    GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 73 (06) : WA155 - WA161
  • [46] CO2 Storage Monitoring via Time-Lapse Full Waveform Inversion with Automatic Differentiation
    Yang, Jixin
    Yu, Pengliang
    Wang, Suran
    Sun, Zheng
    NANOMATERIALS, 2024, 14 (02)
  • [47] Time-lapse seismic modelling of CO2 fluid substitution in the Devonian Redwater Reef, Alberta, Canada
    Sodagar, Taher M.
    Lawton, Don C.
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (03) : 518 - 529
  • [48] Convolutional time-lapse seismic modeling for CO2 sequestration at the Dickman oilfield, Ness County, Kansas
    Li, Jintan
    Liner, Christopher
    Geng, Po
    Zeng, Jianjun
    GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 78 (03) : B147 - B158
  • [49] Thin layer detectability in a growing CO2 plume: testing the limits of time-lapse seismic resolution
    White, James C.
    Williams, Gareth A.
    Chadwick, R. Andrew
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 4356 - 4365
  • [50] Assessing the seismic AVA detectability of CO2 storage sites using novel time-lapse attributes
    Jafargandomi, Arash
    Curtis, Andrew
    PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCE, 2013, 19 (04) : 357 - 374