Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Blood Test Parameters for Pulmonary Inflammatory Pseudotumor

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Bo [1 ]
Wang, Yanming [2 ]
Zhu, Zehua [1 ]
Zhu, Xingxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Nucl Med, Div Life Sci & Med, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Hefei 230001, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Ctr Biomed Imaging, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumor; lung cancer; F-18-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography; blood test parameters; PET/CT IMAGING FEATURES; LUNG;
D O I
10.1097/RTI.0000000000000780
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumor (PIP) is an inflammatory proliferative tumor-like lesion that frequently exhibits hypermetabolism on F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) and is readily misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor. The purpose of this study was to identify PIP by combining PET/computed tomography metabolic and blood test characteristics with machine learning. Patients and Methods: We recruited 27 patients with PIP and 28 patients with lung cancer (LC). The PET metabolic and blood test parameters were collected, and the differences between the groups were evaluated. In addition, we combined the support vector machine (SVM) classifier with the indicators that differed between the groups to classify PIP and LC. Results: For PET metabolic parameters, our findings showed that, as compared with the LC group, maximal standardized uptake value (P < 0.001, t = -4.780), Mean standardized uptake value SUVmean, P < 0.001, t = -4.946), and SD40% (P < 0.001, t = -4.893) were considerably reduced in the PIP group, whereas CV40% (P = 0.004, t = 3.012) was significantly greater. For blood test parameters, the total white blood cell count (P < 0.001, t = 6.457) and absolute neutrophil count (P < 0.001, t = 6.992) were substantially higher in the PIP group than in the LC group. Furthermore, the performance of SVM trained solely on PET metabolic parameters (mean area under the curve [AUC] = 0.84) was comparable to that of SVM trained solely on blood test parameters (mean AUC = 0.86). Surprisingly, utilizing the combined parameters increased SVM performance significantly (mean AUC = 0.98). Conclusion: PET metabolic and blood test parameters differed significantly between the PIP and LC groups, and the SVM paradigm using these significantly different features has the potential to be used to classify PIP and LC, which has important clinical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 303
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pyogenic Aortitis - Role of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Aortic Infection Imaging
    Travieso-Gonzalez, Alejandro
    Vilacosta, Isidre
    Vivas, David
    Olmos, Carmen
    Higueras Nafria, Javier
    Perez Castejon, Maria Jesus
    Ortega Candil, Aida
    Pelayo Alarcon, Adela
    Ortega Medina, Luis
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (03) : 928 - 929
  • [22] 18F-FDG uptake and calcifications on positron emission tomography/computed tomography in octogenarians with severe aortic stenosis
    Conrotto, F.
    Lesca, A.
    D'Ascenzo, F.
    De Berardinis, A.
    Grasso, C.
    Sbarra, P.
    Fava, A.
    Baccega, M.
    Marra, S.
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2015, 63 (03): : 187 - 192
  • [23] Echocardiography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: which is better?
    Enrique, C. Sanchez
    Vilacosta, I.
    Olmos, C.
    Jimenez-Ballve, A.
    Vivas, D.
    Perez-Castejon, M. J.
    Ferrera, C.
    Tirado-Conte, G.
    De Isla, L. Perez
    De Agustin, J. A.
    Carreras-Delgado, J. L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 240 - 240
  • [24] Interim 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography During Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Cancer Patients
    Garibaldi, C.
    Ferrari, M.
    Grana, C. M.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    Cremonesi, M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04) : 267 - 268
  • [25] The role of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of vasculitides
    Braun, J.
    Baraliakos, X.
    Fruth, M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 36 (05) : S108 - S114
  • [26] Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG and cancer response to chemotherapy
    van Ruychevelt, V.
    Garcia, C.
    Meert, A. - P.
    Berghmans, T.
    Paesmans, M.
    Flamen, P.
    Sculier, J. -P.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2011, 28 (05) : 618 - 625
  • [27] ECG-gated 18F-FDG positron emission tomography
    Hans Martin Hoffmeister
    Uwe Helber
    Andreas Franow
    Ulrich Feine
    Roland Bares
    Ludger Seipel
    Wolfgang Müller-Schauenburg
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2002, 18 (5) : 363 - 372
  • [28] 18F-FDG positron emission tomography in oncology: main indications
    Vercher-Conejero, J. L.
    Gamez Cenzano, C.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2016, 58 (04): : 303 - 319
  • [29] Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in anorectal melanoma
    Bakare, Ajinkya N.
    Agrawal, Archi
    Saklani, Avanish
    Engineer, Reena
    Purandare, Nilendu
    Shah, Sneha
    Puranik, Ameya
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (03) : 215 - 221
  • [30] 18F-FDG positron emission tomography CT and assessment of aortitis
    Jones, D. A.
    Goddard, I.
    Wragg, A.
    HEART, 2010, 96 (23) : 1952 - 1952