Causal inference in health and disease: a review of the principles and applications of Mendelian randomization

被引:5
|
作者
Lovegrove, Catherine E. [1 ]
Howles, Sarah A. [1 ]
Furniss, Dominic [2 ]
Holmes, Michael, V [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Bristol, MRC, Bristol, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
epidemiology; genetic association studies; human association studies; mendelian randomization; therapeutics; TYPE-2; DIABETES-MELLITUS; GENETIC-VARIANTS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; RISK; PCSK9; BIAS; ASSOCIATION; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; EPIDEMIOLOGISTS; DAPAGLIFLOZIN;
D O I
10.1093/jbmr/zjae136
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a genetic epidemiological technique that uses genetic variation to infer causal relationships between modifiable exposures and outcome variables. Conventional observational epidemiological studies are subject to bias from a range of sources; MR analyses can offer an advantage in that they are less prone to bias as they use genetic variants inherited at conception as "instrumental variables", which are proxies of an exposure. However, as with all research tools, MR studies must be carefully designed to yield valuable insights into causal relationships between exposures and outcomes, and to avoid biased or misleading results that undermine the validity of the causal inferences drawn from the study. In this review, we outline Mendel's laws of inheritance, the assumptions and principles that underlie MR, MR study designs and methods, and how MR analyses can be applied and reported. Using the example of serum phosphate concentrations on liability to kidney stone disease we illustrate how MR estimates may be visualized and, finally, we contextualize MR in bone and mineral research including exemplifying how this technique could be employed to inform clinical studies and future guidelines concerning BMD and fracture risk. This review provides a framework to enhance understanding of how MR may be used to triangulate evidence and progress research in bone and mineral metabolism as we strive to infer causal effects in health and disease. Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool used by researchers to understand how factors like lifestyle choices or medical conditions affect our health. Some research studies can be hampered by inaccurate information or measurements which mean the results are unreliable. Mendelian randomization uses genetic information to evade this problem. Because a person's genetic information does not change the studies can provide more reliable conclusions about how different factors influence our health. This review provides an overview of Mendelian randomization principles, its applications, and how researchers in bone and mineral research have used it to uncover cause-and-effect relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1552
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Commentary: Mendelian randomization-inspired causal inference in the absence of genetic data
    Zuccolo, Luisa
    Holmes, Michael V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (03) : 962 - 965
  • [32] Mendelian Randomization in Stroke: A Powerful Approach to Causal Inference and Drug Target Validation
    Acosta, Julian N.
    Szejko, Natalia
    Falcone, Guido J.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [33] Causal inference between immune cells and glioblastoma: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
    Hou, Shiqiang
    Jin, Chunjing
    Shi, Beitian
    Chen, Yinan
    Lin, Ning
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025, 16 (01): : 22 - 32
  • [34] Causal Inference for Highly Pleiotropic Biomarkers Using Mendelian Randomization and Bayesian Networks
    Howey, Richard
    Cordell, Heather J.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 43 (07) : 883 - 883
  • [35] Unbiased causal inference with Mendelian randomization and covariate-adjusted GWAS data
    Wang, Peiyao
    Lin, Zhaotong
    Pan, Wei
    HUMAN GENETICS AND GENOMICS ADVANCES, 2025, 6 (02):
  • [36] Limits to causal inference based on mendelian randomization: A comparison with randomized controlled trials
    Nitsch, D
    Molokhia, M
    Smeeth, L
    DeStavola, BL
    Whittaker, JC
    Leon, DA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (05) : 397 - 403
  • [37] Mendelian Randomization in hepatology: A review of principles, opportunities, and challenges
    Song, Yilin
    Ye, Ting
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    Larson, Nicholas B.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2023,
  • [38] Causal Inference in Microbiome Medicine: Principles and Applications
    Lv, Bo-Min
    Quan, Yuan
    Zhang, Hong-Yu
    TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 29 (08) : 736 - 746
  • [39] Causal Factors for Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies
    Alhassan, Eaman
    Nguyen, Kevin
    Hochberg, Marc C.
    Mitchell, Braxton D.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2024, 76 (03) : 366 - 375
  • [40] Causal Inference Between Chronic Periodontitis and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis in a European Population
    Yang, Jie
    Chen, Tianyi
    Zhu, Yahong
    Bai, Mingxia
    Li, Xingang
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12