Revisiting the risk of introduction of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) into the United States - An updated semi-quantitative risk assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Dixon, Andrea L. [1 ]
Oliveira, Ana R. S. [2 ]
Cohnstaedt, Lee W. [3 ]
Mitzel, Dana [3 ]
Mire, Chad [3 ]
Cernicchiaro, Natalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Ctr Outcomes Res & Epidemiol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth & Reprod, Davis, CA USA
[3] ARS, Natl Bio & Agrodef Facil, USDA, Manhattan, KS USA
关键词
Risk analysis; Japanese encephalitis; Emergence; United States; Flavivirus; Vector-borne; WEST-NILE-VIRUS; AEDES-ALBOPICTUS; CROSS-PROTECTION; NEW-ZEALAND; INFECTION; MOSQUITOS; BIRDS; ESTABLISHMENT; TRANSMISSION; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100879
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is associated with encephalitis in humans and reproductive and neurological illness in pigs. JEV has expanded beyond its native distribution in southeast Asia, with identifications in Europe (2010) and Africa (2016), and most recently, its spread into mainland Australia (2021-2022). The introduction of JEV into the United States (US) is a public health risk, and could also impact animal health and the food supply. To efficiently and cost-effectively manage risk, a better understanding of how and where diseases will be introduced, transmitted, and spread is required. To achieve this objective, we updated our group's previous qualitative risk assessment using an established semi-quantitative risk assessment tool (MINTRISK) to compare the overall rate of introduction and risk, including impacts, of JEV in seven US regions. The rate of introduction from the current region of distribution was considered negligible for the Northeast, Midwest, Rocky Mountain, West, Alaska, and Hawaii regions. The South region was the only region with a pathway that had a nonnegligible rate of introduction; infected mosquito eggs and larvae introduced via imported used tires (very low; 95% uncertainty interval (UI) = negligible to high). The overall risk estimate for the South was very high (95% UI = very low to very high). Based on this risk assessment, the South region should be prioritized for surveillance activities to ensure the early detection of JEV. The assumptions used in this risk assessment, due to the lack of information about the global movement of mosquitoes, number of feral pigs in the US, the role of nonardeid wild birds in transmission, and the magnitude of the basic reproduction ratio of JEV in a novel region, need to be fully considered as these impact the estimated probability of establishment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A SEMI-QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT TO SUPPORT OIL PIPELINE RISK-BASED DESIGN
    Mitchell, James
    Jasper, Steve
    Mihell, Jim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 3, 2014,
  • [22] Risk of Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) introduction and spread in CCHF-free countries in southern and Western Europe: A semi-quantitative risk assessment
    Fanelli, Angela
    Buonavoglia, Domenico
    ONE HEALTH, 2021, 13
  • [23] A method of semi-quantitative risk assessment for urban natural gas pipelines
    Bai YongQiang
    Wang Tong
    Lv LiangHai
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2009, : 258 - 263
  • [24] Semi-quantitative risk assessment of groundwater resources for emergency water supply
    Bozek, F.
    Bumbova, A.
    Bakos, E.
    Bozek, A.
    Dvorak, J.
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (04) : 505 - 520
  • [25] DIFFERENTIAL SEMI-QUANTITATIVE URBAN RISK ASSESSMENT OF STORM SURGE INUNDATION
    Wang, Yuewei
    Chen, Xiaodao
    Wang, Lizhe
    14TH GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT, GI4DM 2022, VOL. 10-3, 2022, : 177 - 185
  • [26] Semi-quantitative risk assessment on the impact of port development to wellhead platform
    Hermansyah, Heri
    Kumaraningrum, Anggraini R.
    Sommeng, Andy N.
    Wijanarko, Anondho
    Sahlan, Muhamad
    Shariff, Azmi M.
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2020, 39 (S1)
  • [27] Semi-quantitative cybersecurity risk assessment by blockade and defense level analysis
    Han, Choong-Hee
    Han, ChangHee
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 155 : 306 - 316
  • [28] Reliability in Risk assessment: Evaluation of the Stability and Reproducibility in the use of semi-quantitative assessment methods
    Carvalho, Filipa
    Melo, R.
    OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE - SHO2013, 2013, : 114 - 116
  • [29] The application of the semi-quantitative risk assessment method to urban natural gas pipelines
    Bai, YongQiang
    Lv, LiangHai
    Wang, Tong
    Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2013, 6 (02) : 74 - 77
  • [30] Theoretical semi-quantitative risk assessment methodology for tunnel design and construction processes
    Satici, Ozgur
    Satici, Esra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (07) : 3385 - 3405