Characteristics of strong ground motions and structural damage patterns from the February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes, Turkiye

被引:2
|
作者
Akinci, Aybige [1 ]
Dindar, Ahmet Anil [2 ]
Bal, Ihsan E. [3 ]
Ertuncay, Deniz [4 ,5 ]
Smyrou, Eleni [3 ]
Cheloni, Daniele [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Via Vigna Murata 605, I-00143 Rome, Italy
[2] Gebze Tech Univ, Marmara Res & Training Ctr Disaster Resilient Stru, TR-41400 Kocaeli, Turkiye
[3] Hanze Univ Appl Sci Groningen, Res Ctr Built Environm Noorder Ruimte, NL-9701 DA Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Trieste, Dept Math Informat & Geosci, SeisRaM Working Grp, Via Eduardo Turkey,Weiss 4, I-34128 Trieste, Italy
[5] Natl Inst Oceanog & Appl Geophys OGS, Ctr Seismol Res, Via Treviso 55, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
Kahramanmaras earthquakes; Ground motions; Pulse-like motion; Building damage; Seismic hazard; SEA FAULT ZONE; PREDICTIVE MODEL; FLING-STEP; DIRECTIVITY; EVOLUTION; DEMAND; PGV;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-024-06856-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
On February 6th, 2023, two severe earthquakes struck southeastern Turkiye near the Syrian border. The first earthquake, Mw7.8, occurred at 04:17 local time in the East Anatolian Fault Zone near the city of Gaziantep. The second earthquake, Mw7.5, occurred approximately 9 h later at 13:24 local time near Elbistan County, in Kahramanmaras province. These seismic events ruptured multiple segments of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), with rupture lengths exceeding 300 km, and deformation exceeding 5 m on both sides of the faults. In this study, we aim to analyze characteristics of the strong ground motion induced by the mainshocks, focusing on ground motion intensity measures such as the peak ground acceleration (PGA), the peak ground velocity (PGV), and the pseudo-acceleration response spectra (PSA). The first earthquake produced extremely high PGA values in both horizontal (> 2 g) and vertical (> 1 g) components. At near field distances, large PGVs are measured (> 180 cm/s) with more than 30 impulsive motions which may indicate source-related effects. Large spectral demands are also recorded for both earthquakes, partially underestimated by Ground Motion Models (GMMs), especially in the near-field. Specifically, we compare the PSA for horizontal directions with the design spectra provided by both the new and previous Turkish building codes. We also present building and ground damage observations that provide insights into the observed ground motions in the heavily damaged areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1239
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adiyaman during the Kahramanmaras, (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 2023
    Isika, Ercan
    Avcil, Fatih
    Buyuksarac, Aydin
    Izol, Rabia
    Arslan, Musa Hakan
    Aksoylu, Ceyhun
    Harirchian, Ehsan
    Eyisuren, Onur
    Arkan, Enes
    Gungurg, Mehmet Sakir
    Gunay, Mutlu
    Ulutas, Hakan
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2023, 151
  • [22] Reconnaissance report on damage caused by the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaras, Earthquakes in reinforced-concrete structures
    Sezgin, Sedef Kocakaplan
    Sakcali, Gokhan Baris
    Ozen, Sueleyman
    Yildirim, Eray
    Avci, Eyuebhan
    Bayhan, Beyhan
    Caglar, Naci
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 89
  • [23] Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey Disaster Committee Summary of Field Observations of February 6th Kahramanmaras Earthquakes
    Yilmaz, Sarper
    Karakayali, Onur
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Cetin, Murat
    Eroglu, Serkan Emre
    Dikme, Ozgur
    Ozhasenekler, Ayhan
    Orak, Murat
    Yavasi, Özcan
    Akarca, Funda Karbek
    Eneyli, Muge Gunalp
    Erbil, Bulent
    Akoglu, Haldun
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2023, 38 (03) : 415 - 418
  • [24] Preface for the special issue on February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaras-Turkiye earthquakes (Mw=7.8 and 7.5): reconnaissance missions and first observations
    Cetin, Kemal Onder
    Moss, Robb E. S.
    Yakut, Ahmet
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 23 (03) : 863 - 865
  • [25] Characteristics and simulations of ground motions in Turkey Mw7.8 and Mw7.6 great earthquakes on 6 February 2023
    Wang HongWei
    Qiang ShengYin
    Wen RuiZhi
    Ren YeFei
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2024, 67 (08): : 2990 - 3003
  • [26] Performance evaluation and damage assessment of historical Yusuf Ziya Pasha Mosque after February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes
    Onat, Onur
    Deniz, Faruk
    Ozmen, Alper
    Ozdemir, Engin
    Sayin, Erkut
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 58
  • [27] Pulse-like ground motion observed during the 6 February 2023 MW7.8 Pazarcik Earthquake (Kahramanmaras, SE Turkiye)
    Wu, Fan
    Xie, Junju
    An, Zhao
    Lyu, Chenghao
    Taymaz, Tuncay
    Irmak, Tahir Serkan
    Li, Xiaojun
    Wen, Zengping
    Zhou, Baofeng
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2023, 36 (04) : 328 - 339
  • [28] Rupture Directivity Effects of Large Seismic Sources, Case of February 6th 2023 Catastrophic Earthquakes in Turkey
    O. V. Pavlenko
    V. A. Pavlenko
    Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2023, 59 : 912 - 928
  • [29] Rupture Directivity Effects of Large Seismic Sources, Case of February 6th 2023 Catastrophic Earthquakes in Turkey
    Pavlenko, O. V.
    Pavlenko, V. A.
    IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2023, 59 (06) : 912 - 928
  • [30] Strong ground motions and damage patterns from the 1999 Duzce earthquake in Turkey
    Rathje, Ellen M.
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Baturay, M. Bora
    Bray, Jonathan D.
    Bardet, J. P.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 10 (05) : 693 - 724