Clinician perspectives on postamputation pain assessment and rehabilitation interventions

被引:1
|
作者
Rich, Tonya L. [1 ,2 ]
Falbo, Kierra J. [2 ,3 ]
Phelan, Hannah [3 ,4 ]
Gravely, Amy [3 ]
Krebs, Erin E. [5 ,6 ]
Finn, Jacob A. [1 ,7 ]
Matsumoto, Mary [1 ,8 ]
Muschler, Katherine [3 ]
Olney, Christine M. [2 ,3 ,9 ]
Kiecker, Jessica [1 ]
Hansen, Andrew H. [1 ,2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Minneapolis Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Dept Rehabil & Extended Care, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Rehabil Med, Div Rehabil Sci, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Minneapolis Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Dept Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Milwaukee, WI USA
[5] Minneapolis Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Div Gen Internal Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Med Sch, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Univ Minnesota, Dept Rehabil Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] Univ Minnesota, Sch Nursing, Minneapolis, MN USA
[10] Univ Minnesota, Dept Biomed Engn, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
amputation; phantom limb pain; rehabilitation; nondrug interventions; graded motor imagery; PHANTOM LIMB PAIN; AMPUTATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/PXR.0000000000000284
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain.Study Design:Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System.Results:The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy.Results:Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 447
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postamputation phantom limb pain - Comes the solution into view?
    Haug, M
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2005, 130 (01): : 55 - 59
  • [32] Neuropathic Pain - Assessment in Rehabilitation Settings
    De Groef, An
    Morlion, Bart
    Schillebeeckx, Fabienne
    Meeus, Mira
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION, 2019, 85 (03) : 34 - 43
  • [33] The challenge of learning motivational interviewing (MI) for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR): clinician perspectives
    Shannon, Robert
    Summers, Rachael
    Bruton, Anne
    Donovan-Hall, Maggie
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [34] Oral ketamine therapy in the treatment of postamputation stump pain
    Nikolajsen, L
    Hansen, PO
    Jensen, TS
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 41 (03) : 427 - 429
  • [35] Adopting digital health interventions for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: clinician perspectives
    Gao, Y.
    Diab, A.
    Sharma, A.
    Khoury, S.
    Huynh, P.
    Spaulding, E.
    Martin, S.
    Marvel, F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 3085 - 3085
  • [36] REHABILITATION AND EDUCATION ISSUES WITH IMPLANTED CHILDREN - PERSPECTIVES FROM A PANEL OF CLINICIAN AND EDUCATORS
    OSBERGER, MJ
    DETTMAN, SJ
    DANIEL, K
    MOOG, JS
    SIEBERT, R
    STONE, P
    JORGENSEN, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1991, 12 : 205 - 212
  • [37] Clinician perspectives on the assessment of short-term memory in aphasia
    Greenspan, Wendy
    Obermeyer, Jessica
    Tucker, Carole A.
    Grunwald, Heidi
    Reinert, Laura
    Martin, Nadine
    APHASIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 334 - 356
  • [38] Comparison of Patient and Clinician Perspectives in the Assessment of Antipsychotic Medication Adherence
    Barbui, Corrado
    Kikkert, Martijn
    Mazzi, Maria Angela
    Becker, Thomas
    Bindman, Jonathan
    Schene, Aart
    Nose, Michela
    Helm, Hedda
    Thornicroft, Graham
    Tansella, Michele
    PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 42 (05) : 311 - 317
  • [39] Clinician Perspectives Guiding Approach to Comprehensiveness of Palliative Care Assessment
    Gray, Nathan A.
    Kamal, Arif H.
    Hanson, Laura C.
    Bull, Janet
    Kutner, Jean S.
    Ritchie, Christine S.
    Johnson, Kimberly S.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (02) : 307 - 311
  • [40] Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
    Guo, Liquan
    Zhang, Bochao
    Wang, Jiping
    Wu, Qunqiang
    Li, Xinming
    Zhou, Linfu
    Xiong, Daxi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (24)