Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review

被引:6
|
作者
Haque, Md. Nazmul [1 ,2 ]
Sharifi, Ayyoob [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Urban Environm Sci Lab URBES, Higashihiroshima, Japan
[2] Khulna Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Khulna, Bangladesh
[3] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kagamiyam, Higashihiroshima 7398529, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, 1-5-1 Kagamiyam, Higashihiroshima 7398529, Japan
[5] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Access; Marginalization; Vulnerability; Justice; Ecosystem services; Urban resilience; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; GREEN SPACE; METROPOLITAN-AREA; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH; PARKS; CITY; PERCEPTION; DISPARITY; ACCESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107266
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban ecosystems provide many crucial services to cities and their residents, particularly in adapting to the effects of climate change. Extensive research has been conducted in this field, covering various aspects of ecosystem services. However, little is known about issues related to the limited access to these ecosystem services, particularly among marginalized populations. This review systematically screened 3961 papers and synthesized findings from 98 papers to identify groups that are marginalized in terms of access to urban ecosystem services and provide policy measures to address the issue. We conducted an inductive content analysis and thematic analysis to review the literature comprehensively. Our findings revealed that marginalization is more prevalent in cultural ecosystem services (51 %) than in other ecosystem service types. The results also show that vulnerable populations, including minorities, low-income populations, physically challenged people, children/ young people/students, older people, and migrants, are particularly marginalized. Among these groups, minorities (24 %) emerged as the most extensively studied category. Additionally, we identified a marginalized group labeled as 'generic,' consisting of individuals whose identities did not neatly fit within the previously defined groups or were mentioned across multiple groups simultaneously.The marginalization across all these groups stems from income disparities, cultural norms, racial and ethnic considerations, willingness to visit, agerelated disparities, physical disabilities, and geographical location. Importantly, our study underscores the adverse effects of marginalization on these groups, leading to health disparities, lower quality of life, and reduced resilience to climate change. In light of these findings, we also spotlight policies from the literature such as inclusive urban planning, community engagement initiatives, and financial support aimed at ensuring more equitable access to urban ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic literature review on trust in the software ecosystem
    Fang Hou
    Slinger Jansen
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2023, 28
  • [42] Experiences, perceptions and expectations of health services amongst marginalized populations in urban Australia: A meta-ethnographic review of the literature
    Baker, Kirsten
    Adams, Jon
    Steel, Amie
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (05) : 2166 - 2187
  • [43] Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps
    Mengist, Wondimagegn
    Soromessa, Teshome
    Legese, Gudina
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 702
  • [44] Uncertainties in ecosystem services assessments and their implications for decision support - A semi-systematic literature review
    Walther, Franziska
    Barton, David N.
    Schwaab, Jonas
    Kato-Huerta, Jarumi
    Immerzeel, Bart
    Adamescu, Mihai
    Andersen, Erling
    Coyote, Martha Veronica Arambula
    Arany, Ildiko
    Balzan, Mario
    Bruggeman, Adriana
    Carvalho-Santos, Claudia
    Cazacu, Constantin
    Geneletti, Davide
    Giuca, Relu
    Inacio, Miguel
    Lagabrielle, Erwann
    Lange, Sabine
    Le Clec'h, Solen
    Lim, Zhi Yi Vanessa
    Mortberg, Ulla
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Portela, Ana Paula
    Porucznik, Anna
    Racoviceanu, Tudor
    Rendon, Paula
    Ribeiro, Daniela
    Seguin, Joana
    Hribar, Mateja Smid
    Stoycheva, Vanya
    Vejre, Henrik
    Zoumides, Christos
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 73
  • [45] Practical applications of ecosystem services in spatial planning: Lessons learned from a systematic literature review
    Longato, Davide
    Cortinovis, Chiara
    Albert, Christian
    Geneletti, Davide
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 119 : 72 - 84
  • [46] Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review
    La Rosa, Daniele
    Spyra, Marcin
    Inostroza, Luis
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 74 - 89
  • [47] A Review of Urban Ecosystem Services Research in Southeast Asia
    Lourdes, Karen T.
    Gibbins, Chris N.
    Hamel, Perrine
    Sanusi, Ruzana
    Azhar, Badrul
    Lechner, Alex M.
    LAND, 2021, 10 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [48] A systematic review of epidemiological literature on the eye health of marginalized fishing populations
    Ahmad, Khabir
    Zwi, Anthony B.
    Tarantola, Daniel J. M.
    Chand, Bal
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (10) : S81 - S83
  • [49] Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review
    Croci, Edoardo
    Lucchitta, Benedetta
    Penati, Tommaso
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 16
  • [50] Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Soils and Their Assessment: A Review
    Orlova, K. S.
    Savin, I. Yu.
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2024, 57 (06) : 1072 - 1083