Patient and Provider Perspectives About the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data During Pregnancy: Qualitative Exploratory Study

被引:1
|
作者
MacEwan, Sarah R. [1 ,2 ]
Olvera, Ramona G. [2 ]
Jonnalagadda, Pallavi [2 ]
Fareed, Naleef [2 ,3 ]
McAlearney, Ann Scheck [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Div Gen Internal Med, 700 Ackerman Rd,Suite 4100, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Ctr Advancement Team Sci Analyt & Syst Thinking Hl, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
关键词
patient-generated health data; patient-centered care; obstetrics; postpartum period; qualitative methods; REPORTED OUTCOMES; MOBILE HEALTH; WOMEN; CARE; INTERVENTION; SCORES; RISK;
D O I
10.2196/52397
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is increasing interest in using patient-generated health data (PGHD) to improve patient-centered care duringpregnancy. However, little research has examined the perspectives of patients and providers as they report, collect, and use PGHDto inform obstetric care. Objective: This study aims to explore the perspectives of patients and providers about the use of PGHD during pregnancy, including the benefits and challenges of reporting, collecting, and using these data, as well as considerations for expanding the use of PGHD to improve obstetric care. Methods: We conducted one-on-one interviews with 30 pregnant or postpartum patients and 14 health care providers from 2obstetrics clinics associated with an academic medical center. Semi structured interview guides included questions for patients about their experience and preferences for sharing PGHD and questions for providers about current processes for collecting PGHD, opportunities to improve or expand the collection of PGHD, and challenges faced when collecting and using this information. Interviews were conducted by phone or videoconference and were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and deidentified. Interview transcripts were analyzed deductively and inductively to characterize and explore themes in the data. Results: Patients and providers described how PGHD, including physiologic measurements and experience of symptoms, were currently collected during and between in-person clinic visits for obstetric care. Both patients and providers reported positive perceptions about the collection and use of PGHD during pregnancy. Reported benefits of collecting PGHD included the potential to use data to directly inform patient care (eg, identify issues and adjust medication) and to encourage ongoing patient involvement in their care (eg, increase patient attention to their health). Patients and providers had suggestions for expanding the collection and use of PGHD during pregnancy, and providers also shared considerations about strategies that could be used to expand PGHD collection and use. These strategies included considering the roles of both patients and providers in reporting and interpreting PGHD. Providers also noted the need to consider the unintended consequences of using PGHD that should be anticipated and addressed Conclusions: Acknowledging the challenges, suggestions, and considerations voiced by patients and providers can inform the development and implementation of strategies to effectively collect and use PGHD to support patient-centered care during pregnancy
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enabling Research and Clinical Use of Patient-Generated Health Data (the mindLAMP Platform): Digital Phenotyping Study
    Vaidyam, Aditya
    Halamka, John
    Torous, John
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [32] Harmonizing regulatory regimes for the governance of patient-generated health data
    Winter, Jenifer Sunrise
    Davidson, Elizabeth
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2022, 46 (05)
  • [33] Changing Categorical Work in Healthcare: the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data in Cancer Rehabilitation
    Katerina Cerna
    Miria Grisot
    Anna Sigridur Islind
    Tomas Lindroth
    Johan Lundin
    Gunnar Steineck
    Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2020, 29 : 563 - 586
  • [34] Patient-generated health data: Dimensions, challenges, and open questions
    Figueiredo M.C.
    Chen Y.
    Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 13 (03): : 165 - 297
  • [35] Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD) Interoperability: An Integrative Perspective
    Hussein, Rada
    Crutzen, Rik
    Gutenberg, Johanna
    Kulnik, Stefan Tino
    Sareban, Mahdi
    Niebauer, Josef
    PUBLIC HEALTH AND INFORMATICS, PROCEEDINGS OF MIE 2021, 2021, 281 : 228 - 232
  • [36] Changing Categorical Work in Healthcare: the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data in Cancer Rehabilitation
    Cerna, Katerina
    Grisot, Miria
    Islind, Anna Sigridur
    Lindroth, Tomas
    Lundin, Johan
    Steineck, Gunnar
    COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK-THE JOURNAL OF COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING AND WORK PRACTICES, 2020, 29 (05): : 563 - 586
  • [37] Veteran Preferences and Willingness to Share Patient-Generated Health Data
    Hogan, Timothy P.
    Etingen, Bella
    Zocchi, Mark S.
    Bixler, Felicia R.
    Mcmahon, Nicholas
    Patrianakos, Jamie
    Robinson, Stephanie A.
    Newton, Terry
    Shah, Nilesh
    Frisbee, Kathleen L.
    Shimada, Stephanie L.
    Lipschitz, Jessica M.
    Smith, Bridget M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2025, 40 (05) : 1157 - 1165
  • [38] Recommendations for the Quality Management of Patient-Generated Health Data in Remote Patient Monitoring: Mixed Methods Study
    Abdolkhani, Robab
    Gray, Kathleen
    Borda, Ann
    DeSouza, Ruth
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2023, 11 (01):
  • [39] The Value of Patient Reported Outcomes and Other Patient-Generated Health Data in Clinical Hematology
    Murthy, Hemant S.
    Wood, William A.
    CURRENT HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY REPORTS, 2015, 10 (03) : 213 - 224
  • [40] The Value of Patient Reported Outcomes and Other Patient-Generated Health Data in Clinical Hematology
    Hemant S. Murthy
    William A. Wood
    Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 2015, 10 : 213 - 224