Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of sparse data based on exact likelihood

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Taojun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yi [3 ]
Hattori, Satoshi [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biomed Stat, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Beijing Int Ctr Math Res, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Osaka Univ, Inst Open & Transdisciplinary Res Initiat OTRI, Integrated Frontier Res Med Sci Div, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
generalized linear mixed model; meta-analysis of sparse data; publication bias; research synthesis; selection function; sensitivity analysis; STATISTICAL-METHODS; SAMPLE SELECTION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MODEL; FILL; TRIM;
D O I
10.1093/biomtc/ujae092
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a powerful tool to synthesize findings from multiple studies. The normal-normal random-effects model is widely used to account for between-study heterogeneity. However, meta-analyses of sparse data, which may arise when the event rate is low for binary or count outcomes, pose a challenge to the normal-normal random-effects model in the accuracy and stability in inference since the normal approximation in the within-study model may not be good. To reduce bias arising from data sparsity, the generalized linear mixed model can be used by replacing the approximate normal within-study model with an exact model. Publication bias is one of the most serious threats in meta-analysis. Several quantitative sensitivity analysis methods for evaluating the potential impacts of selective publication are available for the normal-normal random-effects model. We propose a sensitivity analysis method by extending the likelihood-based sensitivity analysis with the $t$-statistic selection function of Copas to several generalized linear mixed-effects models. Through applications of our proposed method to several real-world meta-analyses and simulation studies, the proposed method was proven to outperform the likelihood-based sensitivity analysis based on the normal-normal model. The proposed method would give useful guidance to address publication bias in the meta-analysis of sparse data.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Publication bias in a recent meta-analysis on breastfeeding and IQ
    Ritchie, Stuart J.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2017, 106 (02) : 345 - 345
  • [22] Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences
    Thornton, A
    Lee, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (02) : 207 - 216
  • [23] The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter
    Jackson, Dan
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (17) : 2911 - 2921
  • [24] Be careful about heterogeneity and publication bias in meta-analysis
    Sun, Pengfei
    Zhao, Wenke
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 53 : 76 - 76
  • [25] Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis
    Lin, Lifeng
    Chu, Haitao
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Hong, Chuan
    Qu, Zhiyong
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Chen, Yong
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (08) : 1260 - 1267
  • [26] Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis
    Jin, Zhi-Chao
    Zhou, Xiao-Hua
    He, Jia
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (02) : 343 - 360
  • [27] Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 33 (01) : 74 - 76
  • [28] Publication bias in meta-analysis: seeing the wood for the trees
    Tomkins, JL
    Kotiaho, JS
    OIKOS, 2004, 104 (01) : 194 - 196
  • [29] Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments
    Wolfgang Viechtbauer
    Psychometrika, 2007, 72 : 269 - 271
  • [30] Publication and quality bias in meta-analysis: A case study
    Bennett, DA
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 : 68S - 68S