Trending and emerging prospects of physics-based and ML-based wildfire spread models: a comprehensive review

被引:9
|
作者
Singh, Harikesh [1 ,6 ]
Ang, Li-Minn [2 ]
Lewis, Tom [3 ]
Paudyal, Dipak [4 ]
Acuna, Mauricio [5 ]
Srivastava, Prashant Kumar [7 ]
Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Geospatial Analyt Conservat & Management, Sippy Downs, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Moreton Bay, Australia
[3] Queensland Forest Consulting Serv, Gympie, Qld, Australia
[4] APAC Geospatial, Brisbane, Australia
[5] Univ Sunshine Coast, Forest Res Inst, Sippy Downs, Qld, Australia
[6] SmartSat Cooperat Res Ctr, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[7] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev, Remote Sensing Lab, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Wildfire spread; Fire prediction models; Cellular automata model; WRF-Fire/SFire; FIRETEC; CAWFE; WFDS; FIRE SPREAD; WEATHER RESEARCH; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLAME SPREAD; PREDICTION; BEHAVIOR; WIND; PROPAGATION; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1007/s11676-024-01783-x
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The significant threat of wildfires to forest ecology and biodiversity, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, underscores the necessity for advanced predictive models amidst shifting climate patterns. There is a need to evaluate and enhance wildfire prediction methods, focusing on their application during extended periods of intense heat and drought. This study reviews various wildfire modelling approaches, including traditional physical, semi-empirical, numerical, and emerging machine learning (ML)-based models. We critically assess these models' capabilities in predicting fire susceptibility and post-ignition spread, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Our findings indicate that while traditional models provide foundational insights, they often fall short in dynamically estimating parameters and predicting ignition events. Cellular automata models, despite their potential, face challenges in data integration and computational demands. Conversely, ML models demonstrate superior efficiency and accuracy by leveraging diverse datasets, though they encounter interpretability issues. This review recommends hybrid modelling approaches that integrate multiple methods to harness their combined strengths. By incorporating data assimilation techniques with dynamic forecasting models, the predictive capabilities of ML-based predictions can be significantly enhanced. This review underscores the necessity for continued refinement of these models to ensure their reliability in real-world applications, ultimately contributing to more effective wildfire mitigation and management strategies. Future research should focus on improving hybrid models and exploring new data integration methods to advance predictive capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comprehensive Review of ML-based Time-Series and Signal Processing Techniques and their Hardware Implementations
    Dhavlle, Abhijitt
    Dinakarrao, Sai Manoj Pudukotai
    2020 11TH INTERNATIONAL GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING WORKSHOPS (IGSC), 2020,
  • [22] Physics-Driven ML-Based Modelling for Correcting Inverse Estimation
    Kang, Ruiyuan
    Mu, Tingting
    Liatsis, Panos
    Kyritsis, Dimitrios C.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [23] Data Preprocessing for Utilizing Simulation Models for ML-based Diagnosis
    Kaufmann, David
    Wotawa, Franz
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (04): : 19 - 24
  • [24] Enhancing Indoor mmWave Communication With ML-Based Propagation Models
    Lopez-Ramirez, Gustavo Adulfo
    Aragon-Zavala, Alejandro
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 13748 - 13769
  • [25] PHYSICS-BASED ML AND POLARIMETRIC SAR FOR SOIL MOISTURE RETRIEVAL
    Papale, Lorenzo G.
    Del Frate, Fabio
    Guerriero, Leila
    Schiavon, Giovanni
    Bouchat, Jean
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 1930 - 1933
  • [26] A Benchmark for ML-based Solar Power Generation Forecasting Models
    Ozdemir, Gokcen
    Ozdemir, Umut
    Kuzlu, Murat
    Catak, Ferhat Ozgur
    2024 13TH MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED COMPUTING, MECO 2024, 2024, : 324 - 327
  • [27] On interacting with physics-based models of graphical objects
    Payandeh, S
    Dill, J
    Cai, ZL
    ROBOTICA, 2004, 22 : 223 - 230
  • [28] Physics-based Or Data-driven Models?
    Mason, Richard
    Hart's E and P, 2019, (April):
  • [29] Inverse Problems for Physics-Based Process Models
    Bingham, Derek
    Butler, Troy
    Estep, Don
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, 2024, 11 : 461 - 482
  • [30] Model Selection Among Physics-Based Models
    Hombal, V. K.
    Mahadevan, S.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2013, 135 (02)