共 50 条
Development of an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships: A Delphi study
被引:0
|作者:
Xia, Yuting
[1
]
Huang, Hui
[2
]
Halili, Xirongguli
[1
]
Wang, Guiyun
[3
]
Chen, Qirong
[1
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Nursing, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Xiehe Univ, Sch Nursing, Jinan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Res Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Ctr Evidence Based Practice & Healthcare I, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Academic-practice partnerships;
Evidence-based nursing practice;
Course framework;
Undergraduate nursing students;
Nursing;
EDUCATION;
CONSENSUS;
NURSES;
CARE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104117
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
<bold>Aim: </bold>To develop an evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships. <bold>Background: </bold>Academic-practice partnerships could play a crucial role in bridging theory-practice gap in evidence-based nursing education. However, there is a lack of evidence-based nursing practice course framework for undergraduate nursing students from a perspective of academic-practice partnerships. <bold>Design: </bold>A Delphi study. <bold>Methods: </bold>The Delphi study was conducted by literature analysis, qualitative interview and Delphi expert consultation to develop this course framework. 15 and 12 experts were involved in round one and round two of Delphi expert consultation, respectively. The consensus threshold of two-round Delphi expert consultation was described by expert's positive coefficient (>= 50 %), positive coefficient (>= 70 %), expert authority coefficient (>= 0.7), coefficient of variation (<0.25) and full score frequency (>20 %). <bold>Results: </bold>The final course framework includes learning objectives (17 items); teaching chapters of theoretical classes (five items); teaching contents (30 items), methods (12 items) and class hours (9 items) of theoretical classes; and the responsibilities of academic teachers (11 items) and clinical teachers (11 items) in practical classes. <bold>Conclusion: </bold>The course framework developed by this study could provide guidance for evidence-based nursing education of undergraduate nursing students. The effectiveness of this course framework should be verified through further experimental studies in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文