Fish community monitoring in floodplain lakes: eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling revealed inconsistent fish community composition

被引:1
|
作者
He, Yiwei [1 ]
Zhao, Xianfu [4 ]
Shi, Chenxi [1 ]
Peng, Keyang [1 ]
Wang, Zhe [1 ]
Jiang, Zhongguan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Anhui Prov Key Lab Wetland Ecosyst Protect & Resto, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Shengjin Lake Wetland Ecol Natl Long Term Sc, Dongzhi 247230, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Water Resources & Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Hydroecol, Key Lab Ecol Impacts Hydraul Projects & Restorat A, Minist Water Resources, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fish community; eDNA metabarcoding; Accordion-shaped trap; Multi-mesh gillnets; Floodplain lakes; Multidimensional diversity; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY; RIVER; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; DEGRADATION; TEMPERATURE; INTEGRITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112467
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Fish, acting as the dominant vertebrates in aquatic ecosystems, exhibit strong mobility and complex activity patterns, which make it challenging for the quantitative assessment of fish communities. Previous fieldwork has applied multiple fish sampling devices as well as eDNA technology respectively, with limited studies comparing the reliability, representativity, and applicability of eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling methods in investigating fish assemblages across spatiotemporal scales. In this study, we selected Lake Huang (a provincial nature reserve) to compare the eDNA technology and traditional sampling methods (multi-mesh gillnets and accordion-shaped traps) in revealing differences in species composition, a diversity, and (3 diversity of fish assemblages in both high-water phase and low-water phase. Results showed that eDNA technology detected more fish species and required fewer samples to achieve sufficient sampling compared to traditional methods. Specifically, our results demonstrated significant methodological variations in species composition, with both traditional sampling and eDNA approaches revealing the method-dependent species checklist. In the high-water phase, the eDNA approach recorded significantly lower (3 diversity ((3SOR and (3SIM) than traditional sampling methods, which may result from the more homogeneous eDNA water samples triggered by flooding, resulting in lower between-sites variations in fish communities. However, in the low-water phase, eDNA technology reported significantly higher (3 diversity ((3SOR and (3SNE) than traditional sampling methods, potentially attributed to the loss of eDNA information as well as heterogeneous eDNA samples accompanied by water receding. In addition, taking advantage of the separated and narrowed habitat in the low-water phase, fish individuals were more easily captured, resulting in a relatively higher Shannon-Wiener index recorded by traditional sampling methods. Based on inconsistency in species composition characterized by two methods, our results exhibited that eDNA technology is more efficient in detecting species, while there was an urgent need to design more sensitive primers, provide more complete reference databases, and popularize more emerging sequencing platforms for the advancement of eDNA technology. Comparing with the fish assemblage diversity identified by traditional sampling methods, our result exhibited the transport of DNA fragments may potentially enlarge the homogenized or heterogeneous fish community characterization influenced by flood pulses.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of eDNA sampling methods in an estuarine environment on presence of longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) and fish community composition
    Bowen, Lizabeth
    Waters, Shannon
    Rankin, Lyndsay
    Thorne, Karen
    Gille, Daphne
    de la Cruz, Susan
    Woo, Isa
    Lewis, Levi
    Karpenko, Katie
    Dean, Cheryl
    Schumer, Gregg
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (03):
  • [22] Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods
    Fujii, Kazuya
    Doi, Hideyuki
    Matsuoka, Shunsuke
    Nagano, Mariko
    Sato, Hirotoshi
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [23] Comparison Between Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Traditional Survey Method to Identify Community Composition and Assembly of Stream Fish
    Liu, Ziyu
    Hu, Cong
    You, Wenhui
    Li, Shuxin
    Wu, Yongsheng
    Liang, Yangyang
    Chu, Ling
    Yan, Yunzhi
    Zhang, Chen
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [24] Maximizing sampling efficiency to detect differences in fish community composition using environmental DNA metabarcoding in subarctic fjords
    Guri, Gledis
    Westgaard, Jon-Ivar
    Yoccoz, Nigel
    Wangensteen, Owen S.
    Praebel, Kim
    Ray, Jessica Louise
    Kelly, Ryan P.
    Shelton, Andrew Olaf
    Hanebrekke, Tanja
    Johansen, Torild
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [25] Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river
    Masayuki K. Sakata
    Takeshi Watanabe
    Nobutaka Maki
    Kousuke Ikeda
    Toshihiro Kosuge
    Hiroaki Okada
    Hiroki Yamanaka
    Tetsuya Sado
    Masaki Miya
    Toshifumi Minamoto
    Limnology, 2021, 22 : 221 - 235
  • [26] Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring
    Hui-Ting Ruan
    Rui-Li Wang
    Hong-Ting Li
    Li Liu
    Tian-Xu Kuang
    Min Li
    Ke-Shu Zou
    Zoological Research, 2022, 43 (02) : 192 - 204
  • [27] Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring
    Ruan, Hui-Ting
    Wang, Rui-Li
    Li, Hong-Ting
    Liu, Li
    Kuang, Tian-Xu
    Li, Min
    Zou, Ke-Shu
    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 43 (02) : 192 - 204
  • [28] Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river
    Sakata, Masayuki K.
    Watanabe, Takeshi
    Maki, Nobutaka
    Ikeda, Kousuke
    Kosuge, Toshihiro
    Okada, Hiroaki
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    Sado, Tetsuya
    Miya, Masaki
    Minamoto, Toshifumi
    LIMNOLOGY, 2021, 22 (02) : 221 - 235
  • [30] eDNA metabarcoding reveals differences in fish diversity and community structure in heterogeneous habitat areas shaped by cascade hydropower
    Cheng, Ruli
    Luo, Yang
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Li, Qinghua
    Li, Yingwen
    Shen, Yanjun
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 13 (07):