Fish community monitoring in floodplain lakes: eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling revealed inconsistent fish community composition

被引:1
|
作者
He, Yiwei [1 ]
Zhao, Xianfu [4 ]
Shi, Chenxi [1 ]
Peng, Keyang [1 ]
Wang, Zhe [1 ]
Jiang, Zhongguan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Anhui Prov Key Lab Wetland Ecosyst Protect & Resto, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Shengjin Lake Wetland Ecol Natl Long Term Sc, Dongzhi 247230, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Water Resources & Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Hydroecol, Key Lab Ecol Impacts Hydraul Projects & Restorat A, Minist Water Resources, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fish community; eDNA metabarcoding; Accordion-shaped trap; Multi-mesh gillnets; Floodplain lakes; Multidimensional diversity; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY; RIVER; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; DEGRADATION; TEMPERATURE; INTEGRITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112467
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Fish, acting as the dominant vertebrates in aquatic ecosystems, exhibit strong mobility and complex activity patterns, which make it challenging for the quantitative assessment of fish communities. Previous fieldwork has applied multiple fish sampling devices as well as eDNA technology respectively, with limited studies comparing the reliability, representativity, and applicability of eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling methods in investigating fish assemblages across spatiotemporal scales. In this study, we selected Lake Huang (a provincial nature reserve) to compare the eDNA technology and traditional sampling methods (multi-mesh gillnets and accordion-shaped traps) in revealing differences in species composition, a diversity, and (3 diversity of fish assemblages in both high-water phase and low-water phase. Results showed that eDNA technology detected more fish species and required fewer samples to achieve sufficient sampling compared to traditional methods. Specifically, our results demonstrated significant methodological variations in species composition, with both traditional sampling and eDNA approaches revealing the method-dependent species checklist. In the high-water phase, the eDNA approach recorded significantly lower (3 diversity ((3SOR and (3SIM) than traditional sampling methods, which may result from the more homogeneous eDNA water samples triggered by flooding, resulting in lower between-sites variations in fish communities. However, in the low-water phase, eDNA technology reported significantly higher (3 diversity ((3SOR and (3SNE) than traditional sampling methods, potentially attributed to the loss of eDNA information as well as heterogeneous eDNA samples accompanied by water receding. In addition, taking advantage of the separated and narrowed habitat in the low-water phase, fish individuals were more easily captured, resulting in a relatively higher Shannon-Wiener index recorded by traditional sampling methods. Based on inconsistency in species composition characterized by two methods, our results exhibited that eDNA technology is more efficient in detecting species, while there was an urgent need to design more sensitive primers, provide more complete reference databases, and popularize more emerging sequencing platforms for the advancement of eDNA technology. Comparing with the fish assemblage diversity identified by traditional sampling methods, our result exhibited the transport of DNA fragments may potentially enlarge the homogenized or heterogeneous fish community characterization influenced by flood pulses.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering
    Evans, Nathan T.
    Li, Yiyuan
    Renshaw, Mark A.
    Olds, Brett P.
    Deiner, Kristy
    Turner, Cameron R.
    Jerde, Christopher L.
    Lodge, David M.
    Lamberti, Gary A.
    Pfrender, Michael E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2017, 74 (09) : 1362 - 1374
  • [2] A Comparative Evaluation of eDNA Metabarcoding Primers in Fish Community Monitoring in the East Lake
    Li, Yiwen
    Tang, Minzhe
    Lu, Suxiang
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Fang, Chengchi
    Tan, Li
    Xiong, Fan
    Zeng, Honghui
    He, Shunping
    WATER, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [3] Fish community shifts along a strong fluvial environmental gradient revealed by eDNA metabarcoding
    Garcia-Machado, Erik
    Laporte, Martin
    Normandeau, Eric
    Hernandez, Cecilia
    Cote, Guillaume
    Paradis, Yves
    Mingelbier, Marc
    Bernatchez, Louis
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2022, 4 (01): : 117 - 134
  • [4] Using eDNA Metabarcoding to Monitor Changes in Fish Community Composition After Barrier Removal
    Muha, Teja P.
    Rodriguez-Barreto, Deiene
    O'Rorke, Richard
    Garcia de Leaniz, Carlos
    Consuegra, Sofia
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [5] Assessing riverine fish community diversity and stability by eDNA metabarcoding
    Gu, Songsong
    Deng, Ye
    Wang, Pengyuan
    Li, Chenhong
    Shi, Dejun
    Wang, Shuping
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 157
  • [6] Cage transplant experiment shows weak transport effect on relative abundance of fish community composition as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding
    Laporte, M.
    Berger, C. S.
    Garcia-Machado, E.
    Cote, G.
    Morissette, O.
    Bernatchez, L.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
  • [7] Harnessing eDNA metabarcoding to investigate fish community composition and its seasonal changes in the Oslo fjord
    Carvalho, Cintia Oliveira
    Gromstad, William
    Dunthorn, Micah
    Karlsen, Hans Erik
    Schroder-Nielsen, Audun
    Ready, Jonathan Stuart
    Haugaasen, Torbjrn
    Sornes, Grete
    de Boer, Hugo
    Mauvisseau, Quentin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [8] Environmental biomonitoring of reef fish community structure with eDNA metabarcoding in the Coral Triangle
    Gelis, Ester Restiana Endang
    Kamal, M. Mukhlis
    Subhan, Beginer
    Bachtiar, Imam
    Sani, Lalu M. Iqbal
    Madduppa, Hawis
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2021, 104 (08) : 887 - 903
  • [9] Environmental biomonitoring of reef fish community structure with eDNA metabarcoding in the Coral Triangle
    Ester Restiana Endang Gelis
    M. Mukhlis Kamal
    Beginer Subhan
    Imam Bachtiar
    Lalu M. Iqbal Sani
    Hawis Madduppa
    Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2021, 104 : 887 - 903
  • [10] eDNA metabarcoding reveals differences in fish diversity and community structure in Danjiang River
    Deng, Jie
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Yao, Xueying
    Rao, Junhua
    Dai, Fei
    Wang, Han
    Wang, Yicong
    Jiang, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):