Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

被引:1
|
作者
Taylor, Emily D. [1 ]
Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Psychol, Southampton, England
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Psychol & Ergon, Marchstr 23, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Reward; Visual attention; Visual search; Attentional capture; Suppression; Pd; N2pc; TOP-DOWN; OCULOMOTOR CAPTURE; VISUAL-SEARCH; NEURAL MECHANISMS; STATISTICAL REGULARITIES; IRRELEVANT STIMULI; INCENTIVE SALIENCE; TASK-IRRELEVANT; BOTTOM-UP; CONTINGENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120831
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
One driving factor for attention deployment towards a stimulus is its associated value due to previous experience and learning history. Previous visual search studies found that when looking for a target, distractors associated with higher reward produce more interference (e.g., longer response times). The present study investigated the neural mechanism of such value-driven attention deployment. Specifically, we were interested in which of the three attention sub-processes are responsible for the interference that was repeatedly observed behaviorally: enhancement of relevant information, attentional capture by irrelevant information, or suppression of irrelevant information. We replicated earlier findings showing longer response times and lower accuracy when a target competed with a high-reward compared to a low-reward distractor. We also found a spatial gradient of interference: behavioral performance dropped with increasing proximity to the target. This gradient was steeper for high- than low-reward distractors. Event-related potentials of the EEG signal showed the reason for the reward-induced attentional bias: High-reward distractors required more suppression than low-reward distractors as evident in larger Pd components. This effect was only found for distractors near targets, showing the additional filtering needs required for competing stimuli in close proximity. As a result, fewer attentional resources can be distributed to the target when it competes with a high-reward distractor, as evident in a smaller target-N2pc amplitude. The distractor-N2pc, indicative of attentional capture, was neither affected by distance nor reward, showing that attentional capture alone cannot explain interference by stimuli of high value. In sum our results show that the higher need for suppression of high-value stimuli contributes to reward-modulated attention deployment and increased suppression can prevent attentional capture of high-value stimuli.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Population coding for a reward-modulated Hebbian learning of vergence control
    Gibaldi, Agostino
    Canessa, Andrea
    Chessa, Manuela
    Solari, Fabio
    Sabatini, Silvio P.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2013,
  • [22] Overt Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli Overcomes Inhibitory Suppression
    Pearson, Daniel
    Watson, Poppy
    Cheng, Phillip
    Le Pelley, Mike E.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2020, 46 (05) : 489 - 501
  • [23] BioLCNet: Reward-Modulated Locally Connected Spiking Neural Networks
    Ghaemi, Hafez
    Mirzaei, Erfan
    Nouri, Mahbod
    Kheradpisheh, Saeed Reza
    MACHINE LEARNING, OPTIMIZATION, AND DATA SCIENCE, LOD 2022, PT II, 2023, 13811 : 564 - 578
  • [24] Statistical Mechanics of Reward-Modulated Learning in Decision-Making Networks
    Katahira, Kentaro
    Okanoya, Kazuo
    Okada, Masato
    NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2012, 24 (05) : 1230 - 1270
  • [25] Memory-driven attentional capture is modulated by temporal task demands
    Dalvit, Silvia
    Eimer, Martin
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2011, 19 (02) : 145 - 153
  • [26] Reward-Modulated Functional Connectivity Between Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum
    Zhang, Yan
    Pan, Xiaochuan
    Wang, Rubin
    ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS (V), 2016, : 225 - 232
  • [27] The influence of task-relevance and awareness on reward-driven attentional capture
    Gruener, Markus
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    PERCEPTION, 2022, 51 : 71 - 71
  • [28] Reward history but not search history explains value-driven attentional capture
    Janina R. Marchner
    Claudia Preuschhof
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2018, 80 : 1436 - 1448
  • [29] Reward history but not search history explains value-driven attentional capture
    Marchner, Janina R.
    Preuschhof, Claudia
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2018, 80 (06) : 1436 - 1448
  • [30] Meta-learning in spiking neural networks with reward-modulated STDP
    Khoee, Arsham Gholamzadeh
    Javaheri, Alireza
    Kheradpisheh, Saeed Reza
    Ganjtabesh, Mohammad
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2024, 600