共 50 条
A comparative effectiveness study of usual care, simple Chuna manual therapy, and complex Chuna manual therapy for the treatment of pelvic biomechanical lesions in patients with non-acute low back pain: a protocol for multicenter, randomized controlled trial
被引:0
|作者:
Park, Sun-Young
[1
]
Shin, Yeong-Jae
[2
]
Ha, In-Hyuk
[3
]
Yun, Jung Min
[4
]
Jang, Jun-Su
[5
]
Lee, Sanghun
[6
]
Yim, Mi Hong
[5
]
Choi, Woosu
[5
]
Suh, Hae Sun
[7
,8
,9
]
Yoon, Hyuna
[8
,9
]
Ryu, Dahye
[8
,9
]
Lee, Yeon-Woo
[2
]
Heo, In
[1
,2
]
Hwang, Man-Suk
[1
,2
]
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
[1
,2
]
Shin, Byung-Cheul
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Korean Med, Dept Korean Med, Yangsan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Korean Med Hosp, Spine & Joint Ctr, Dept Korean Med Rehabil, 20 Geumo Ro, Yangsan Si 50612, Gyeongnam, South Korea
[3] Jaseng Med Fdn, Jaseng Spine & Joint Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Jaseng Hosp Korean Med, Dept Korean Med Rehabil, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Inst Oriental Med, Digital Hlth Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
[6] Korea Inst Oriental Med, Korean Med Data Div, Daejeon, South Korea
[7] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Pharm, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Regulatory Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Kyung Hee Univ, Inst Regulatory Innovat Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词:
Chuna manual therapy;
Low back pain;
Spinal manipulation;
Cost-benefit analysis;
Randomized clinical trial;
Protocol;
D O I:
10.1186/s12906-024-04653-5
中图分类号:
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号:
10 ;
摘要:
BackgroundChuna manual therapy (CMT), a Korean manual therapy technique predominantly used for treating low back pain (LBP) and related disorders, lacks well-conceived research focusing on its comparative effectiveness, safety, and economic evaluation, particularly with respect to complex CMT with established CMT diagnostic algorithms. This study aims to illustrate a protocol for a randomized clinical study for comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of complex CMT with simple CMT and usual care.MethodsThis is a protocol for a three-armed, multicenter, assessor-blinded, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial study. A total of 81 patients suffering from non-acute LBP with pelvic biomechanical lesions (PBL), characterized by a pain duration of at least two weeks and a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of 5 or higher, will be recruited from two Korean medicine hospitals. These participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: complex CMT plus usual care (UC; n = 27), simple CMT plus UC (n = 27), or UC groups (n = 27). They will undergo treatment for 4 weeks, and follow-up assessments will be performed 8 weeks after treatment completion. The primary outcome will be the NRS score of LBP, and secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient Global Impression of Change, credibility and expectancy questionnaire, three-dimensional posture analysis indicators, quality of life assessment, economic evaluation, and safety assessments.DiscussionThis will be the first study to assess the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of complex CMT compared to UC and simple/complex CMT in patients with LBP and PBL. We will also analyze useful diagnostic methods to help in clinical practice for CMT diagnosis.Trial registrationClinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0009210. Registered on February 28, 2024.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文