Approach to systematic improvements of dependability within railway asset management

被引:0
|
作者
Granstrom, Rikard [1 ]
Soderholm, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Trafikverket, Box 809, S-97125 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Qual Technol & Logist Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Railway infrastructure; Dependability; Compliance; Asset management;
D O I
10.1007/s13198-024-02523-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes results from a research and development (R&D) project at Trafikverket (Swedish transport administration). The purpose of the study was to systemize dependability improvements of Trafikverket's Control Command and Signalling (CCS) assets considering all phases of its life cycle. A case study was conducted on level crossings that represent a critical part of the CCS system. The results of the study show that the systemic approach contributes to asset management by short-term dependability and productivity improvements as well as by medium term specifications for system modifications and long-term specifications for next generation of level crossings. The approach is based on a combination of methodologies and tools described in dependability standards, e.g., Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). However, the approach also considers aspects from Design of Experiments (DoE) to support field tests aligned with other tasks in the railway infrastructure. Besides contributing to improvements, the approach complies with regulations and mandatory standards. Examples of these are Common Safety Method for Risk Evaluation and Assessment (CSM-RA, EU 402/2013) and EN 50126-RAMS (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety) for railway applications. In addition, the approach complies with regulatory requirements related to enterprise risk management and internal control, i.e., effectiveness, productivity, compliance and documentation. The approach also supports asset management in accordance with the ISO 55000-series.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incorporating local environmental factors into railway bridge asset management
    Yianni, Panayioti C.
    Neves, Luis C.
    Rama, Dovile
    Andrews, John D.
    Dean, Robert
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 128 : 362 - 373
  • [42] Gaps in Asset Management Systems to Integrate Railway Companies' Resilience
    Rajamaki, Jyri
    Savolainen, Jari
    Pirinen, Rauno
    Medina, Eduardo Villamor
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY ICCWS, 2023, : 318 - 326
  • [43] Risk-informed sustainable asset management of railway tracks
    Sasidharan, Manu
    Torbaghan, Mehran Eskandari
    INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2021, 8 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [44] System Petri net modelling for railway infrastructure asset management
    Litherland, Jack
    Andrews, John
    INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [45] Framework for implementing track deterioration analytics into railway asset management
    Sauni, Mikko
    Luomala, Heikki
    Kolisoja, Pauli
    Vaismaa, Kalle
    BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2022, 12 (06) : 871 - 886
  • [46] The integration of railway asset management information to ensure maintenance effectiveness
    Van Der Westhuven, Jacice
    Graebe, Hannes
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 55 (03) : 18 - 29
  • [47] Electrical susbstation dependability analysis for high speed railway systems: A simplified approach
    Cosulich, G
    Firpo, P
    Savio, S
    COMPUTERS IN RAILWAYS V, VOL 2: RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 1996, : 139 - 148
  • [48] DEEP RENOVATIONS WITHIN SMART ASSET MANAGEMENT
    Nippala, E.
    Vainio, T.
    EXPANDING BOUNDARIES: SYSTEMS THINKING IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, : 322 - 326
  • [49] A holistic approach to asset management in the Netherlands
    van der Velde, Jenne
    Klatter, Leo
    Bakker, Jaap
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2013, 9 (04) : 340 - 348
  • [50] ASSET MANAGEMENT: TIME FOR AN INTEGRATED APPROACH
    Ferguson, Kenneth
    FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 61 (1T) : 407 - 410