共 50 条
Essential oils mouthwash with or without alcohol in relation to effect on parameters of plaque and gingivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:0
|作者:
van Swaaij, B. W. M.
[1
,2
,3
]
Van der Weijden, G. A.
[1
,2
]
Smith, R. J.
[1
,2
]
Timmerman, M. F.
[4
]
Slot, D. E.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Dept Periodontol, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, NL-1081 LA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, NL-1081 LA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Appl Sci, Dept Dent Hyg, Hgsk Arnhem Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr Radboudumc, Dept Implantol & Periodontol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金:
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词:
alcohol;
essential oils;
gingivitis;
mouth rinse;
mouthwash;
plaque;
ORAL-CANCER RISK;
SUPRAGINGIVAL PLAQUE;
MANAGING GINGIVITIS;
CHEMICAL-AGENTS;
MOUTHRINSE;
EFFICACY;
PERIODONTITIS;
PREVALENCE;
SEVERITY;
INFLAMMATION;
D O I:
10.1111/idh.12843
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Aim: The primary aim was to systematically assess the available literature on the effect of an essential oils mouthwash without alcohol (EOalc-) compared to an essential oils mouthwash with alcohol (EOalc+) on plaque scores and parameters of gingival health. The secondary aim was to evaluate user appreciation. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL databases were searched to identify eligible studies published up to and including March 2024. Papers comparing the effectiveness of EOalc- and EOalc+ were included. The quality was assessed. A descriptive analysis and a meta-analysis were performed. Results: After screening, seven papers were found to be eligible. The descriptive analysis demonstrates a significant difference in plaque scores in favour of EOalc+. This is confirmed by the meta-analyses of plaque scores in non-brushing and brushing studies (DiffM = 0.40; 95% CI [0.27; 0.53], p < 0.00001 and DiffM = 0.05; 95% CI [0.01; 0.10], p = 0.01, respectively). This finding is also supported by the sub-analysis of brands. The meta-analyses of bleeding and gingival scores in brushing studies did not show significant differences between products. For user appreciation, the difference found was for taste perception in favour of EOalc- (DiffM = 1.63; 95% CI [0.72; 2.55], p = 0.0004). Conclusion: When an EO-mouthwash is used in non-brushing or brushing situations, with small to moderate certainty, EOalc- provided less effect regarding plaque control than EOalc+. For bleeding and gingival index there is weak certainty for no difference. In terms of the taste perception EOalc- seems more appreciated.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 202
页数:17
相关论文