Hemodynamic Optimization by Invasive Ramp Test in Patients Supported With HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device

被引:3
|
作者
Rubinstein, Gal [1 ]
Moeller, Cathrine M. [1 ]
Lotan, Dor [1 ]
Slomovich, Sharon [1 ]
Fernandez-Valledor, Andrea [1 ]
Oren, Daniel [1 ]
Oh, Kyung T. [1 ]
Fried, Justin A. [1 ]
Clerkin, Kevin J. [1 ]
Raikhelkar, Jayant K. [1 ]
Topkara, Veli K. [1 ]
Kaku, Yuji [2 ]
Takeda, Koji [2 ]
Naka, Yoshifumi [2 ]
Burkhoff, Daniel [3 ]
Latif, Farhana [1 ]
Majure, David [4 ]
Colombo, Paolo C. [1 ]
Yuzefpolskaya, Melana [1 ]
Sayer, Gabriel T. [1 ]
Uriel, Nir [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
LVAD; HM3; hemodynamics; RVF; RAMP study; optimization; SPEED OPTIMIZATION; FAILURE; IMPLANTATION; DYSFUNCTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000002167
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In patients supported by the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (HM3 LVAD), pump speed adjustments may improve hemodynamics. We investigated the hemodynamic implications of speed adjustments in HM3 recipients undergoing hemodynamic ramp tests. Clinically stable HM3 recipients who underwent routine invasive hemodynamic ramp tests between 2015 and 2022 at our center were included. Filling pressure optimization, defined as central venous pressure (CVP) <12 mm Hg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) <18 mm Hg, was assessed at baseline and final pump speeds. Patients with optimized pressures were compared to nonoptimized patients. Overall 60 HM3 recipients with a median age of 62 years (56, 71) and time from LVAD implantation of 187 days (124, 476) were included. Optimized filling pressures were found in 35 patients (58%) at baseline speed. Speed was adjusted in 84% of the nonoptimized patients. Consequently, 39 patients (65%) had optimized pressures at final speed. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic findings between baseline and final speeds (p > 0.05 for all). Six and 12 month readmission-free rates were higher in optimized compared with nonoptimized patients (p = 0.03 for both), predominantly due to lower cardiac readmission-free rates (p = 0.052). In stable outpatients supported with HM3 who underwent routine ramp tests, optimized hemodynamics were achieved in only 2 of 3 of the patients. Patients with optimized pressures had lower all-cause readmission rates, primarily driven by fewer cardiac-related hospitalizations.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 650
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device as a strategy to bridge to transplant
    Kilcoyne, Maxwell F.
    Huckaby, Lauren, V
    Hashmi, Zubair
    Witer, Lucas
    Pope, Nicolas
    Houston, Brian A.
    Inampudi, Chakradhari
    Tedford, Ryan J.
    Kilic, Arman
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (12) : 4713 - 4718
  • [42] Implication of hemodynamic ramp tests in patients with left ventricular assist devices
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 45 (02) : 187 - 187
  • [43] Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Which One HeartWare or HeartMate3?
    Kocabeyoglu, S. S.
    Kervan, U.
    Sert, D. E.
    Demirkan, B.
    Guray, Y.
    Catav, Z.
    Beyazal, O.
    Unal, U.
    Pac, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S442 - S443
  • [44] Migration of a HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Jabbar, Ali Abdul
    Etheridge, Whitson B.
    Frazier, O. H.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 6 (03) : E30 - E30
  • [45] Invasive Hemodynamic Red Flags to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Araj, Faris G.
    Amin, Alpesh A.
    Garg, Sonia
    Hardin, E. Ashley
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (12): : E375 - E376
  • [46] Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion on Thromboembolic Complications in Patients Supported by the Heartmate II Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Lewis, R. S.
    Mangum, M.
    Wang, L.
    Puhlman, M.
    Evenson, K.
    Remick, J.
    Ott, G.
    Abraham, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S129 - S130
  • [47] Left Ventricular Assist Device Exchange to HeartMate III Using Minimally Invasive Approach
    Patel, A. R.
    Patel, N. H.
    Bhattad, V.
    Leal, A.
    Miranda, C. Guerrero
    Hashmi, Z. A.
    Meyer, D. M.
    Hall, S.
    Rafael, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S430 - S430
  • [48] Mechanical Device Malfunction of the HeartMate II Versus the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: The Rotterdam Experience
    van der Heiden, Cornelis W.
    Zijderhand, Casper F.
    Veen, Kevin M.
    Constantinescu, Alina A.
    Manintveld, Olivier C.
    Brugts, Jasper J.
    Bekkers, Jos A.
    Birim, Ozcan
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    Caliskan, Kadir
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2023, 69 (02) : E80 - E85
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Exchange of the HeartMate II (HMII) Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) to the Intrapericardial HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD)
    Soleimani, B.
    Burk, B.
    Stephenson, E.
    Pae, W.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S82 - S82
  • [50] AORTIC ROOT THROMBOSIS IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED INCIDENCE OF AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY IN PATIENTS SUPPORTED WITH HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
    Marshall, Dylan P.
    Laracuente, Ronald
    Carey, Matthew
    Clerkin, Kevin
    Masoumi, Amirali
    Raikhelkar, Jayant
    Griffin, Jan
    Leb, Jay S.
    Kaku, Yuji
    Jain, Sneha
    Sanchez, Joseph E.
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo
    Takeda, Koji
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Uriel, Nir
    Topkara, Veli
    Fried, Justin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 823 - 823