Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Dasari, Suhas P. [1 ]
Kanumuri, Sanjana D. [1 ]
Yang, JaeWon [1 ]
Manner, Paul A. [1 ]
Fernando, Navin D. [1 ]
Hernandez, Nicholas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
extended antibiotic prophylaxis; periprosthetic joint infection; PJI; antibiotic prophylaxis; antibiotic duration; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; ORAL ANTIBIOTICS; INFECTION; MANAGEMENT; BURDEN; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is growing interest in extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, the benefit of EAP remains controversial. For this investigation, both oral and intravenous antibiotic protocols were included in the EAP group. Methods: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid Embase, Elton B. Stephens CO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were queried for literature comparing outcomes of primary and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who were treated with either <24 hours of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (standard of care [SoC]) or >24 hours of EAP. The primary outcome was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A pooled relative-risk random-effects MantelHaenszel model was implemented to compare cohorts. Results: There were 18 studies with a total of 19,153 patients included. There was considerable variation in antibiotic prophylaxis protocols with first-generation cephalosporins being the most commonly implemented antibiotic for both groups. Patients treated with EAP were 35% less likely to develop PJI relative to the SoC (P = .0004). When examining primary TJA, patients treated with EAP were 39% and 40% less likely to develop a PJI for TJA (P = .0008) and THA (P = .02), respectively. There was no significant difference for primary TKA (P = .17). When examining aseptic revision TJA, EAP led to a 36% and 47% reduction in the probability of a PJI for aseptic revision TJA (P = .007) and aseptic revision TKA (P = .008), respectively; there was no observed benefit for aseptic revision THA (P = .36). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients treated with EAP were less likely to develop a PJI relative to those treated with the SoC for all TJA, primary TJA, primary THA, aseptic revision TJA, and aseptic revision TKA. There was no significant difference observed between EAP and SoC for primary TKA or aseptic revision THA. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S476 / S487
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Kong, Lingde
    Cao, Junming
    Zhang, Yingze
    Ding, Wenyuan
    Shen, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (03) : 529 - 536
  • [42] A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
    Sun, Xuedong
    Su, Zheng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [43] A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
    Xuedong Sun
    Zheng Su
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [44] Mepivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Siddiqi, Ahmed
    Mahmoud, Yusuf
    Secic, Michelle
    Tozzi, John M.
    Emara, Ahmed
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Culp, Brian
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Springer, Bryan D.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (07): : 1396 - +
  • [45] Contemporary indications for aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty
    Freitag, Tobias
    Reichel, Heiko
    ORTHOPADIE, 2022, 51 (08): : 609 - 618
  • [46] Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
    Khatod, Monti
    Cafri, Guy
    Namba, Robert S.
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Paxton, Elizabeth W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07): : 1412 - 1417
  • [47] Risk Factors for Total Knee Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
    Namba, Robert S.
    Cafri, Guy
    Khatod, Monti
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Brox, Timothy W.
    Paxton, Elizabeth W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08): : 122 - 127
  • [48] Infection Rates After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis
    Mohiuddin, Amer
    Rice, Justin
    Ziemba-Davis, Mary
    Meneghini, R. Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2024, 32 (10) : 472 - 480
  • [49] Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in 2-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Almaslmani, Saud
    Entezari, Bahar
    Safir, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (09): : 1900 - 1907
  • [50] THE PROBLEM IN TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY - ASEPTIC LOOSENING
    GOLDRING, SR
    CLARK, CR
    WRIGHT, TM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (06): : 799 - 801