The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK parents' attitudes towards routine childhood vaccines: A mixed-methods study

被引:2
|
作者
Skirrow, Helen [1 ]
Lewis, Celine [2 ,3 ]
Haque, Habiba [4 ]
Choundary-Salter, Lena [4 ]
Foley, Kim [1 ]
Whittaker, Elizabeth [5 ,6 ]
Costelloe, Ceire [1 ,7 ]
Bedford, Helen [2 ]
Saxena, Sonia [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[2] UCL, Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, Populat Policy & Practice, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Sick Children, London North Genom Lab Hub, London, England
[4] Mosa Community Trust, London, England
[5] Imperial Coll London, Sect Paediat Infect Dis, London, England
[6] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Paediat Infect Dis, London, England
[7] Inst Canc Res, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 08期
关键词
IMMUNIZATION; HESITANCY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0306484
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background COVID-19 vaccines were key to controlling the pandemic and vaccination has been discussed extensively by the media and the public since 2020. We aimed to explore parents' attitudes towards routine childhood vaccination since COVID-19 and how the pandemic impacted their experiences of getting their child vaccinated. Methods We used a mixed-methods approach-involving a questionnaire survey followed by focus groups. We partnered with The Mosaic Community Trust, an ethnic minority women's group based in a deprived area of North-West London, United Kingdom (UK) with historically low childhood vaccine uptake. Descriptive findings from the questionnaires were reported and chi-square analyses performed to examine differences by ethnicity. Thematic analysis of the free-text questionnaire responses and focus groups was undertaken, guided by the COM-B model of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation. Results Between Jun-Oct 2022, 518 parents completed the questionnaire (25% from ethnic minorities). Between March-May 2023 we held four focus groups with 22 parents (45% from ethnic minorities). Most parents (>90%) thought routine childhood vaccines for children were important. Over a third (38%) of all parents reported having more questions about childhood vaccines since COVID-19, though among parents belonging to an ethnicity group other than white, 59% said they had more questions compared to those of any white ethnicity group (30%, (p = <0.0001)). Difficulties accessing vaccine appointments were commoner reasons for children's vaccinations being delayed than parents increased concerns about vaccines. Since COVID-19 some parents felt vaccinations were even more important, and a very small minority felt the pandemic had made them mistrust vaccinations. Conclusion Following COVID-19, we found parents remain confident in childhood vaccines. However, some parents, particularly from ethnic minority groups may have more questions about childhood vaccines than pre-pandemic. Post COVID-19, to address declining vaccine uptake, parents need easy access to healthcare professionals to answer questions about childhood vaccinations.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine childhood immunisation in Colombia
    Moreno-Montoya, Jose
    Marcela Ballesteros, Silvia
    Rojas Sotelo, Jaid Constanza
    Bocanegra Cervera, Clara Lucia
    Barrera-Lopez, Pedro
    De la Hoz-Valle, Jose A.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2022, 107 (03) : E4
  • [32] UK advanced practice nurses' experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study
    Wood, Emily
    King, Rachel
    Senek, Michaela
    Robertson, Steve
    Taylor, Bethany
    Tod, Angela
    Ryan, Anthony
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [33] The heterogeneity of the COVID-19 pandemic and national responses: an explanatory mixed-methods study
    Yi-Ying Chen
    Yibeltal Assefa
    BMC Public Health, 21
  • [34] Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic:Mixed-Methods Study
    Henry, Michael B.
    Funsten, Emily
    Michealson, Marisa A.
    Albright, Danielle
    Crandall, Cameron S.
    Sklar, David P.
    George, Naomi
    Greenwood-Ericksen, Margaret
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (05)
  • [35] Pandemic perceptions: a mixed-methods study of young adults during COVID-19
    Mant, Madeleine
    Aslemand, Asal
    Prine, Andrew
    Holland, Alyson
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2022, 177 : 114 - 115
  • [36] Nurses' pandemic lives: A mixed-methods study of experiences during COVID-19
    Gray, Kathleen
    Dorney, Paulette
    Hoffman, Lori
    Crawford, Albert
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 60
  • [37] Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on abortions and births in Sweden: a mixed-methods study
    Rydelius, Johanna
    Edalat, Mina
    Nyman, Viola
    Jar-Allah, Tagrid
    Milsom, Ian
    Hognert, Helena
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [38] The heterogeneity of the COVID-19 pandemic and national responses: an explanatory mixed-methods study
    Chen, Yi-Ying
    Assefa, Yibeltal
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [39] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients' experiences obtaining a tuberculosis diagnosis in Peru: a mixed-methods study
    Millones, Ana Karina
    Lecca, Leonid
    Acosta, Diana
    Campos, Hortencia
    Del Aguila-Rojas, Erika
    Farronay, Sheyla
    Morales, Giannina
    Ramirez-Sandoval, Judith
    Torres, Isabel
    Jimenez, Judith
    Yuen, Courtney M.
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [40] Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with asthma: a co-produced mixed-methods study
    Jackson, Tracy
    Mcclatchey, Kirstie
    Chan, Amy Hai Yan
    Morgan, Noelle
    Kinley, Emma
    Pinnock, Hilary
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2024, 39 (12) : 1766 - 1786